Tally has been actively supporting Uniswap DAO since December 2020, less than 3 months after the UNI token was launched in September 2020. We are excited to continue building for the Uniswap DAO by enhancing the governance experience and rolling out key developments to further strengthen the Uniswap DAO’s onchain governance infrastructure. To continue providing these services and pursue future improvements, we are requesting $250,000 annually for 2 years.
Tally is the leading interface for Uniswap DAO’s onchain governance. Over the past 6 months, 75% of Uniswap DAO’s proposals were created on Tally with an average of 55.2% of onchain votes being cast on Tally.
Tally has been deeply engaged with the Uniswap DAO, providing essential governance infrastructure that has enabled its success. Our goal is to further enhance Uniswap’s governance capabilities and create an even better experience for the community.
Tally’s importance has grown over time, as Uniswap Labs has stopped maintaining Sybil.org and removed voting from the app.uniswap.org interface. We believe it’s important for the decentralization of the DAO to have many great interfaces for governance. The best way to ensure that is to fund them.
We believe the DAO should have the flexibility to allocate resources to the governance platform that best serves the DAO’s needs. Many DAO contributors and delegates have expressed support for using multiple governance interfaces. The Uniswap Foundation engaged Agora for a similar-sized grant. Tally plays a critical role in Uniswap DAO governance—currently it is the only platform that allows for the creation of proposals in the Uniswap DAO (all other proposals are created via command line). Tally’s no-code proposal tools, including the ability to create private drafts of proposals to be shared and edited among delegates, are highly popular with Uniswap proposal creators.
We are seeking this grant to:
Our focus is on the future. With this grant, we plan to build out features that will create a deeper, more robust governance experience—one that scales with Uniswap’s growth and helps contributors make impactful decisions.
(1) The Uniswap DAO relies on Tally for governance.
Tally is the preferred governance platform for Uniswap DAO delegates and contributors, providing a simple and efficient way to vote, delegate, and participate in governance discussions. Uniswap DAO members consistently use Tally to engage in the decision-making process. As the DAO grows, Tally continues to play a critical role in facilitating transparent and effective governance.
Tally is the most popular onchain governance platform in the Uniswap DAO, and it’s becoming more popular over time.
Recent governance proposals and the percentage of votes that took place on Tally include:
| Proposal Title | Date | Votes Cast on Tally | Proposal Created on Tally? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onboarding Package Bundle | April 21, 2024 | 52.9% | no |
| Update Uni v3/v2 Deployment Process (March 2024) | April 21, 2024 | 65.5% | no |
| Mobilizing the Uniswap Treasury | April 27, 2024 | 57.5% | no |
| DeFi Education Fund | May 20, 2024 | 41.7% | yes |
| Uniswap Delegate Reward- 3 Months Cycle 1 | May 25, 2024 | 35.9% | yes |
| Uniswap Arbitrum LTIPP Matching | June 23, 2024 | 50.5% | yes |
| Onboarding Package for Gnosis Chain | August 7, 2024 | 67.5% | yes |
| Deploy Uniswap v3 on X Layer | August 14, 2024 | 84.0% | yes |
| Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2 | August 26, 2024 | 78.0% | yes |
| Proposal to activate 2, 3, 4 bps fee-tiers on Base | September 4, 2024 | 29.3% | yes |
| Uniswap Accountability S3 Renewal and Rebalance | September 16, 2024 | 52.5% | yes |
| Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program | September 24, 2024 | 69.8% | yes |
In total, Uniswap contributors use Tally for both proposal creation and proposal drafting:
(2) Tally has consistently rolled out key features and improvements that have enhanced the governance experience for Uniswap DAO. These include:
(3) Tally has an exciting roadmap for Uniswap DAO coming up.
Tally needs you, the DAO participant, to help shape the future of Uniswap DAO’s governance tooling. We would like to offer a monthly office hours as an open feedback session for Uniswap DAO contributors to suggest new features and contribute to our roadmap. We receive a lot of inbound from Uniswap DAO contributors in informal settings and we would like to open this process up to the DAO in a more formal way.
Looking ahead, Tally has many new features on its roadmap that may further elevate the Uniswap DAO’s governance experience. Some features and products on our roadmap that may be interesting to the Uniswap DAO community include:
Tally will provide a quarterly report for the Uniswap DAO, detailing key achievements, including uptime metrics, notes from Community Calls, support metrics, as well as enhancements to the Uniswap DAO’s governance on Tally (as outlined above).
Budget:
Proposal Timeline:
KPIs
Tally will provide a quarterly report for the Uniswap DAO, detailing key achievements, including uptime metrics, notes from Community Calls, support metrics, as well as enhancements to the Uniswap DAO’s governance on Tally (as outlined above).
Tally has been actively supporting Uniswap DAO since December 2020, less than 3 months after the UNI token was launched in September 2020. We are excited to continue building for the Uniswap DAO by enhancing the governance experience and rolling out key developments to further strengthen the Uniswap DAO’s onchain governance infrastructure. To continue providing these services and pursue future improvements, we are requesting $250,000 annually for 2 years.
Tally is the leading interface for Uniswap DAO’s onchain governance. Over the past 6 months, 75% of Uniswap DAO’s proposals were created on Tally with an average of 55.2% of onchain votes being cast on Tally.
Tally has been deeply engaged with the Uniswap DAO, providing essential governance infrastructure that has enabled its success. Our goal is to further enhance Uniswap’s governance capabilities and create an even better experience for the community.
Tally’s importance has grown over time, as Uniswap Labs has stopped maintaining Sybil.org and removed voting from the app.uniswap.org interface. We believe it’s important for the decentralization of the DAO to have many great interfaces for governance. The best way to ensure that is to fund them.
We believe the DAO should have the flexibility to allocate resources to the governance platform that best serves the DAO’s needs. Many DAO contributors and delegates have expressed support for using multiple governance interfaces. The Uniswap Foundation engaged Agora for a similar-sized grant. Tally plays a critical role in Uniswap DAO governance—currently it is the only platform that allows for the creation of proposals in the Uniswap DAO (all other proposals are created via command line). Tally’s no-code proposal tools, including the ability to create private drafts of proposals to be shared and edited among delegates, are highly popular with Uniswap proposal creators.
We are seeking this grant to:
Our focus is on the future. With this grant, we plan to build out features that will create a deeper, more robust governance experience—one that scales with Uniswap’s growth and helps contributors make impactful decisions.
(1) The Uniswap DAO relies on Tally for governance.
Tally is the preferred governance platform for Uniswap DAO delegates and contributors, providing a simple and efficient way to vote, delegate, and participate in governance discussions. Uniswap DAO members consistently use Tally to engage in the decision-making process. As the DAO grows, Tally continues to play a critical role in facilitating transparent and effective governance.
Tally is the most popular onchain governance platform in the Uniswap DAO, and it’s becoming more popular over time.
Recent governance proposals and the percentage of votes that took place on Tally include:
| Proposal Title | Date | Votes Cast on Tally | Proposal Created on Tally? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onboarding Package Bundle | April 21, 2024 | 52.9% | no |
| Update Uni v3/v2 Deployment Process (March 2024) | April 21, 2024 | 65.5% | no |
| Mobilizing the Uniswap Treasury | April 27, 2024 | 57.5% | no |
| DeFi Education Fund | May 20, 2024 | 41.7% | yes |
| Uniswap Delegate Reward- 3 Months Cycle 1 | May 25, 2024 | 35.9% | yes |
| Uniswap Arbitrum LTIPP Matching | June 23, 2024 | 50.5% | yes |
| Onboarding Package for Gnosis Chain | August 7, 2024 | 67.5% | yes |
| Deploy Uniswap v3 on X Layer | August 14, 2024 | 84.0% | yes |
| Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2 | August 26, 2024 | 78.0% | yes |
| Proposal to activate 2, 3, 4 bps fee-tiers on Base | September 4, 2024 | 29.3% | yes |
| Uniswap Accountability S3 Renewal and Rebalance | September 16, 2024 | 52.5% | yes |
| Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program | September 24, 2024 | 69.8% | yes |
In total, Uniswap contributors use Tally for both proposal creation and proposal drafting:
(2) Tally has consistently rolled out key features and improvements that have enhanced the governance experience for Uniswap DAO. These include:
(3) Tally has an exciting roadmap for Uniswap DAO coming up.
Tally needs you, the DAO participant, to help shape the future of Uniswap DAO’s governance tooling. We would like to offer a monthly office hours as an open feedback session for Uniswap DAO contributors to suggest new features and contribute to our roadmap. We receive a lot of inbound from Uniswap DAO contributors in informal settings and we would like to open this process up to the DAO in a more formal way.
Looking ahead, Tally has many new features on its roadmap that may further elevate the Uniswap DAO’s governance experience. Some features and products on our roadmap that may be interesting to the Uniswap DAO community include:
Tally will provide a quarterly report for the Uniswap DAO, detailing key achievements, including uptime metrics, notes from Community Calls, support metrics, as well as enhancements to the Uniswap DAO’s governance on Tally (as outlined above).
Budget:
Proposal Timeline:
KPIs
Tally will provide a quarterly report for the Uniswap DAO, detailing key achievements, including uptime metrics, notes from Community Calls, support metrics, as well as enhancements to the Uniswap DAO’s governance on Tally (as outlined above).
The Event Horizon Community Voted to Support this Proposal ehUNI-38: EventHorizon.vote/vote/uniswap/ehUNI-38
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-supporting-tally-s-continued-development-and-enhancements-for-uniswap-dao-governance/24748/42
The Event Horizon Community Voted to Support this Proposal ehUNI-38: EventHorizon.vote/vote/uniswap/ehUNI-38
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-supporting-tally-s-continued-development-and-enhancements-for-uniswap-dao-governance/24748/42
A good project and strong team in a predictable and transparent roadmap, planned and projected. I think in the near future we will see an unprecedented growth of this project. But in all seriousness, there's a bit of a free-rider problem with supporting this sort of public good/open access gov infra, but I think at Uniswap's scale it makes sense to bite the bullet and put forward a small but meaningful contribution, even if other daos end up free-riding on it.
After reviewing the Tally proposal and the feedback from other delegates, I am voting **AGAINST** the proposal. ### Value Proposition: * Continued support for Tally within the Uniswap DAO. ### Main Concerns: * No KPIs directly tied to Uniswap. * Unclear budget allocation specific to Uniswap. * Unclear value proposition or upside for Uniswap. The DAO should not be picking winners. If we want to proceed with something like this, we should issue an open call for other service providers to participate.
A good project and strong team in a predictable and transparent roadmap, planned and projected. I think in the near future we will see an unprecedented growth of this project. But in all seriousness, there's a bit of a free-rider problem with supporting this sort of public good/open access gov infra, but I think at Uniswap's scale it makes sense to bite the bullet and put forward a small but meaningful contribution, even if other daos end up free-riding on it.
After reviewing the Tally proposal and the feedback from other delegates, I am voting **AGAINST** the proposal. ### Value Proposition: * Continued support for Tally within the Uniswap DAO. ### Main Concerns: * No KPIs directly tied to Uniswap. * Unclear budget allocation specific to Uniswap. * Unclear value proposition or upside for Uniswap. The DAO should not be picking winners. If we want to proceed with something like this, we should issue an open call for other service providers to participate.
amazing this a very beautifull news
amazing this a very beautifull news
Thanks for the updated deployment proposal process Devin!
I believe most deployment proposals did not deploy on testnet beforehand- though I think this is good guidance. This minimizes the time between proposal->deployment.
A few questions about the deployment process I'd like to raise
Thanks for the updated deployment proposal process Devin!
I believe most deployment proposals did not deploy on testnet beforehand- though I think this is good guidance. This minimizes the time between proposal->deployment.
A few questions about the deployment process I'd like to raise
Do deployment proposals become a thing of the past if the v3 BSL is not renewed?
Should license grants be paired with conditionals?
How should non-EVM deployments of Uniswap v3 be treated differently?
I appreciate this topic being re-visited as there has been an influx of deployment proposals lately. It's important to keep the community guidelines around this cohesive to not waste delegates' time.
Thanks for the updated deployment proposal process Devin!
I believe most deployment proposals did not deploy on testnet beforehand- though I think this is good guidance. This minimizes the time between proposal->deployment.
A few questions about the deployment process I'd like to raise
Thanks for the updated deployment proposal process Devin!
I believe most deployment proposals did not deploy on testnet beforehand- though I think this is good guidance. This minimizes the time between proposal->deployment.
A few questions about the deployment process I'd like to raise
Do deployment proposals become a thing of the past if the v3 BSL is not renewed?
Should license grants be paired with conditionals?
How should non-EVM deployments of Uniswap v3 be treated differently?
I appreciate this topic being re-visited as there has been an influx of deployment proposals lately. It's important to keep the community guidelines around this cohesive to not waste delegates' time.
