The Uniswap protocol is at a pivotal inflection point. With major decisions on the horizon—including the transformative UNIfication proposal to activate protocol fees— the need for a transparent and highly accountable governance system has never been more critical. The stakes are immense, and the responsibility lies with our delegates.
To empower every UNI holder to monitor and hold their representatives accountable, and recognizing the need for transparent infrastructure, we have built and are launching the Uniswap Delegate Dashboard as a public good for the community.
Our goal is simple: to provide a clear, data-driven view of our delegates’ activities. This tool is built on the principle of "don't trust, verify," enabling any community member to see how governance is functioning, particularly as we move toward decisions that will fundamentally shape the protocol's future and value accrual mechanisms. This level of transparency is essential for maintaining the decentralized governance integrity of Uniswap.
Live Dashboard: https://uniswap.curiahub.xyz/ Gitbook: https://curialab.gitbook.io/uniswap-delegate-dashboard/
This thread will serve as:
The dashboard provides delegate-centric insights to make Uniswap governance more accessible and transparent, reinforcing the accountability of those entrusted with voting power over the protocol and its substantial treasury.
How to Verify Your Score
The dashboard today is just a starting point. To make it truly useful, we need your help to shape its future. Here are two key areas where we’d love your input:
Delegate Score
A meaningful Delegate Score should reflect our collective values. What does a great delegate look like to you? Here are our initial ideas for metrics to start the conversation:
| Metric | Definition | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Voting Participation Score | Measures the percentage of proposals a delegate has voted on since their first eligible proposal. | Ensures delegates consistently represent Uniswap DAO, upholding the Reliability of our governance system. |
| Voting Impact Score | Evaluates how often a delegate’s vote aligns with the final passing outcome, adjusted by the voting power they used. | Highlights delegates who effectively contribute to securing the protocol. |
| Voting Timeliness Score | Tracks how early in the voting window a delegate casts their vote, rewarding proactive participation. | Encourages proactive participation, allowing for deeper community discussion and alignment before decisions are finalized. |
| Rationale Submission Score | Assesses how frequently a delegate provides explanations for their votes, both onchain and in forum discussions. | Promotes Integrity, allowing any member of Uniswap community to understand the reasoning behind a delegate’s decisions. |
| Forum Score | Quantifies offchain governance engagement, such as forum discussions, proposal feedback, and proposal initiations. | Recognizes vital offchain contributions that Strengthen the Uniswap Community, a primary goal of our governance system. |
| Number of Votes Cast | Simple count of proposals voted on, adjusted for activity windows. | Offers a baseline indicator of a delegate’s overall activity level. |
Activity Status Definitions
Are our current definitions for Active, Inactive, and Ghost fair and useful? What would you change?
This is a community tool, and your input is what will make it truly valuable for Uniswap DAO. We’d love for you to get involved by:
The Uniswap protocol is at a pivotal inflection point. With major decisions on the horizon—including the transformative UNIfication proposal to activate protocol fees— the need for a transparent and highly accountable governance system has never been more critical. The stakes are immense, and the responsibility lies with our delegates.
To empower every UNI holder to monitor and hold their representatives accountable, and recognizing the need for transparent infrastructure, we have built and are launching the Uniswap Delegate Dashboard as a public good for the community.
Our goal is simple: to provide a clear, data-driven view of our delegates’ activities. This tool is built on the principle of "don't trust, verify," enabling any community member to see how governance is functioning, particularly as we move toward decisions that will fundamentally shape the protocol's future and value accrual mechanisms. This level of transparency is essential for maintaining the decentralized governance integrity of Uniswap.
Live Dashboard: https://uniswap.curiahub.xyz/ Gitbook: https://curialab.gitbook.io/uniswap-delegate-dashboard/
This thread will serve as:
The dashboard provides delegate-centric insights to make Uniswap governance more accessible and transparent, reinforcing the accountability of those entrusted with voting power over the protocol and its substantial treasury.
How to Verify Your Score
The dashboard today is just a starting point. To make it truly useful, we need your help to shape its future. Here are two key areas where we’d love your input:
Delegate Score
A meaningful Delegate Score should reflect our collective values. What does a great delegate look like to you? Here are our initial ideas for metrics to start the conversation:
| Metric | Definition | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Voting Participation Score | Measures the percentage of proposals a delegate has voted on since their first eligible proposal. | Ensures delegates consistently represent Uniswap DAO, upholding the Reliability of our governance system. |
| Voting Impact Score | Evaluates how often a delegate’s vote aligns with the final passing outcome, adjusted by the voting power they used. | Highlights delegates who effectively contribute to securing the protocol. |
| Voting Timeliness Score | Tracks how early in the voting window a delegate casts their vote, rewarding proactive participation. | Encourages proactive participation, allowing for deeper community discussion and alignment before decisions are finalized. |
| Rationale Submission Score | Assesses how frequently a delegate provides explanations for their votes, both onchain and in forum discussions. | Promotes Integrity, allowing any member of Uniswap community to understand the reasoning behind a delegate’s decisions. |
| Forum Score | Quantifies offchain governance engagement, such as forum discussions, proposal feedback, and proposal initiations. | Recognizes vital offchain contributions that Strengthen the Uniswap Community, a primary goal of our governance system. |
| Number of Votes Cast | Simple count of proposals voted on, adjusted for activity windows. | Offers a baseline indicator of a delegate’s overall activity level. |
Activity Status Definitions
Are our current definitions for Active, Inactive, and Ghost fair and useful? What would you change?
This is a community tool, and your input is what will make it truly valuable for Uniswap DAO. We’d love for you to get involved by:
