Hey folks — as described in this thread, we are now proceeding to the 48 hour Application Period for projects who'd like their users to be included in the retroactive airdrop for users affected by the proxy contract omission. As a reminder, these are the criteria for inclusion:
We define “projects” as being any entity whose users were excluded from the retroactive UNI allocation due to the proxy contract issue identified above.
In order to be eligible for inclusion in this distribution, a “project” must meet the following criteria:
All provided addresses will be verified against historical Uniswap v1 and v2 calls to exclude any addresses that were not in the call-chain of a Uniswap transaction (successful or failed). Open-source code to verify that this is indeed the case will be published for independent review. All addresses will be verified for not having been in the initial retroactive UNI allocation.
Hey folks — as described in this thread, we are now proceeding to the 48 hour Application Period for projects who'd like their users to be included in the retroactive airdrop for users affected by the proxy contract omission. As a reminder, these are the criteria for inclusion:
We define “projects” as being any entity whose users were excluded from the retroactive UNI allocation due to the proxy contract issue identified above.
In order to be eligible for inclusion in this distribution, a “project” must meet the following criteria:
All provided addresses will be verified against historical Uniswap v1 and v2 calls to exclude any addresses that were not in the call-chain of a Uniswap transaction (successful or failed). Open-source code to verify that this is indeed the case will be published for independent review. All addresses will be verified for not having been in the initial retroactive UNI allocation.
UNİSWAP WLT 0x3db666E3e3462cB73871b09E3d4B2708040605F2
0xfd74f4efea84f8ef739cadee450872f38f3d5f2f4ff047579f6699e8c2bcf30a sao tui chua nhan dc nua
# What is the name of your project*
Myetherwallet
# Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Transaction Hash: 0xc4acadb7edc37c1a40e1bd3e3d270beddfca40815c709873c60e9e4513dd4a9b
cheers! v3 comments?
not how many on the list, even though the transaction was done at the uniswap. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x940b1c311231a8171bc0e179957adbfe907bb894c7bea2d3f971df0a467705ff Address: 0x869615d3B96BE9Eb6C83FD17F05D4053E27BBda3
UNİSWAP WLT 0x3db666E3e3462cB73871b09E3d4B2708040605F2
0xfd74f4efea84f8ef739cadee450872f38f3d5f2f4ff047579f6699e8c2bcf30a sao tui chua nhan dc nua
# What is the name of your project*
Myetherwallet
# Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Transaction Hash: 0xc4acadb7edc37c1a40e1bd3e3d270beddfca40815c709873c60e9e4513dd4a9b
cheers! v3 comments?
not how many on the list, even though the transaction was done at the uniswap. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x940b1c311231a8171bc0e179957adbfe907bb894c7bea2d3f971df0a467705ff Address: 0x869615d3B96BE9Eb6C83FD17F05D4053E27BBda3
TokenStars
TokenStars
0xb9b7c6627df3b79f2f899e6f3036982494421b2b957d6e0c9d5baa49bf631a6d 0x858d87f8f5cc152ec01471199e1d535cf3ad9d19cc2f82b7c32263621db558be 0x203249fa9b50030cf26e1a53847f1182781acaa206c9927e1fb2768c50f1435d [0xb84f2012931d7dc5d3438ab2dd33a9d573d169044920cb1ac15a9fc09161fdae] [0x28f7bc08f92295eb08ff6f6d674af5960e8c9aa06c79c5878cad619b94358a81] [0x10717f49aefae043c138c12a9b41c1ccb0db9f5662cb7490ef2562a32d9229cc] [0x77f13a427bdea45e9393f96762d748aabef4a0c2cfab637ee2273858481b8110] 0x1a90d248098b1de73e20a04c403039689cbb8addc755d3e85046bf4ecae422b5
We have also created a liquidity pool directly on Uniswap: 0xe7c3a8963637edb8d4162f9299a36bbb8419845818989a92c256ae3ab92aae5f
Here is the transaction. It was after the 1st of September.
BR, Philipp, General Manager
This Boosterd do it behind my back ... Bloody boots
Translation are bearly chased....
Tapcoin (TTT)
pair/0x7f1fd0E2A650513Bc8b89Dd66a51267b772D0225
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
/address/0x9f599410d207f3d2828a8712e5e543ac2e040382#code
Tapcoin (TTT)
pair/0x7f1fd0E2A650513Bc8b89Dd66a51267b772D0225
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
/address/0x9f599410d207f3d2828a8712e5e543ac2e040382#code
Contract Address : 0x9f599410d207f3d2828a8712e5e543ac2e040382
TokenStars
TokenStars
0xb9b7c6627df3b79f2f899e6f3036982494421b2b957d6e0c9d5baa49bf631a6d 0x858d87f8f5cc152ec01471199e1d535cf3ad9d19cc2f82b7c32263621db558be 0x203249fa9b50030cf26e1a53847f1182781acaa206c9927e1fb2768c50f1435d [0xb84f2012931d7dc5d3438ab2dd33a9d573d169044920cb1ac15a9fc09161fdae] [0x28f7bc08f92295eb08ff6f6d674af5960e8c9aa06c79c5878cad619b94358a81] [0x10717f49aefae043c138c12a9b41c1ccb0db9f5662cb7490ef2562a32d9229cc] [0x77f13a427bdea45e9393f96762d748aabef4a0c2cfab637ee2273858481b8110] 0x1a90d248098b1de73e20a04c403039689cbb8addc755d3e85046bf4ecae422b5
We have also created a liquidity pool directly on Uniswap: 0xe7c3a8963637edb8d4162f9299a36bbb8419845818989a92c256ae3ab92aae5f
Here is the transaction. It was after the 1st of September.
BR, Philipp, General Manager
This Boosterd do it behind my back ... Bloody boots
Translation are bearly chased....
Tapcoin (TTT)
pair/0x7f1fd0E2A650513Bc8b89Dd66a51267b772D0225
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
/address/0x9f599410d207f3d2828a8712e5e543ac2e040382#code
Tapcoin (TTT)
pair/0x7f1fd0E2A650513Bc8b89Dd66a51267b772D0225
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
/address/0x9f599410d207f3d2828a8712e5e543ac2e040382#code
Contract Address : 0x9f599410d207f3d2828a8712e5e543ac2e040382
I also too sent PR on behalf of Rebalance.to Now you please send money to the accounts
This is hash transactions on 1inch exchange : 0xeddc3e2edd496f1c19d4309d24d74c767ab36ac96e0a65ee60252391869bb39a
We've submitted the PR. (from team member ZD)
We have submitted the PR with all the requested information
I also too sent PR on behalf of Rebalance.to Now you please send money to the accounts
This is hash transactions on 1inch exchange : 0xeddc3e2edd496f1c19d4309d24d74c767ab36ac96e0a65ee60252391869bb39a
We've submitted the PR. (from team member ZD)
We have submitted the PR with all the requested information
Transaction Hash:
0xdadbc2ea2ff7a97de0a32021284dc3873170624704b721bd67241f854ed8742e
Cant claim uni token because of kyber, i need help please...
We found 4935 unique transaction 1inch tx originators who missed UNI airdrop but used Uniswap internally.
SELECT
DISTINCT from_address
FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.transactions
WHERE hash IN (
SELECT transaction_hash FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces
WHERE DATE(block_timestamp) < "2020-09-01" AND (SUBSTR(input, 1, 10) = '0x022c0d9f' OR to_address = '0x2157a7894439191e520825fe9399ab8655e0f708')
INTERSECT DISTINCT
SELECT transaction_hash FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces
WHERE DATE(block_timestamp) < "2020-09-01" AND to_address IN (
'0x0000000053d411becdb4a82d8603edc6d8b8b3bc',
'0x0000000f8ef4be2b7aed6724e893c1b674b9682d',
'0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781',
'0x0000000006adbd7c01bc0738cdbfc3932600ad63',
'0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b',
'0x000005edbbc1f258302add96b5e20d3442e5dd89',
'0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f',
'0xe4c577bdec9ce0f6c54f2f82aed5b1913b71ae2f',
'0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e',
'0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d',
'0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a',
'0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e',
'0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd'
)
)
Uniswap V1 condition: to_address = '0x2157a7894439191e520825fe9399ab8655e0f708' Uniswap V2 condition: SUBSTR(input, 1, 10) = '0x022c0d9f'
We found 4935 unique transaction 1inch tx originators who missed UNI airdrop but used Uniswap internally.
SELECT
DISTINCT from_address
FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.transactions
WHERE hash IN (
SELECT transaction_hash FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces
WHERE DATE(block_timestamp) < "2020-09-01" AND (SUBSTR(input, 1, 10) = '0x022c0d9f' OR to_address = '0x2157a7894439191e520825fe9399ab8655e0f708')
INTERSECT DISTINCT
SELECT transaction_hash FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces
WHERE DATE(block_timestamp) < "2020-09-01" AND to_address IN (
'0x0000000053d411becdb4a82d8603edc6d8b8b3bc',
'0x0000000f8ef4be2b7aed6724e893c1b674b9682d',
'0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781',
'0x0000000006adbd7c01bc0738cdbfc3932600ad63',
'0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b',
'0x000005edbbc1f258302add96b5e20d3442e5dd89',
'0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f',
'0xe4c577bdec9ce0f6c54f2f82aed5b1913b71ae2f',
'0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e',
'0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d',
'0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a',
'0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e',
'0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd'
)
)
Uniswap V1 condition: to_address = '0x2157a7894439191e520825fe9399ab8655e0f708' Uniswap V2 condition: SUBSTR(input, 1, 10) = '0x022c0d9f'
Addresses: github . com/CryptoManiacsZone/1inch-uni-addresses/blob/master/users_filtered.csv
hey djalle can you send me your address so I can check? if you don't want to post it here, you can submit it as an issue on that github repo
List of Excluded Users: hxxps://github.com/nedodn/DEXAG_UNI_ADDRESSES/blob/master/excludedUNIAddresses.json
Hallo nedodn,
I've used DEX.AG > Uniswap for some swaps, but my address is not included in the list. Maybe could you check why is not included?
Thanks a lot
responded to that address.
Adding in DEXAG's list of excluded users as well as our script. (had to defang the links since it won't let me post links for some reason)
List of Excluded Users: hxxps://github.com/nedodn/DEXAG_UNI_ADDRESSES/blob/master/excludedUNIAddresses.json
Link to Script: hxxps://github.com/nedodn/DEXAG_UNI_ADDRESSES/blob/master/getUniAddresses.js
Transaction Hash:
0xdadbc2ea2ff7a97de0a32021284dc3873170624704b721bd67241f854ed8742e
Cant claim uni token because of kyber, i need help please...
We found 4935 unique transaction 1inch tx originators who missed UNI airdrop but used Uniswap internally.
SELECT
DISTINCT from_address
FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.transactions
WHERE hash IN (
SELECT transaction_hash FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces
WHERE DATE(block_timestamp) < "2020-09-01" AND (SUBSTR(input, 1, 10) = '0x022c0d9f' OR to_address = '0x2157a7894439191e520825fe9399ab8655e0f708')
INTERSECT DISTINCT
SELECT transaction_hash FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces
WHERE DATE(block_timestamp) < "2020-09-01" AND to_address IN (
'0x0000000053d411becdb4a82d8603edc6d8b8b3bc',
'0x0000000f8ef4be2b7aed6724e893c1b674b9682d',
'0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781',
'0x0000000006adbd7c01bc0738cdbfc3932600ad63',
'0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b',
'0x000005edbbc1f258302add96b5e20d3442e5dd89',
'0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f',
'0xe4c577bdec9ce0f6c54f2f82aed5b1913b71ae2f',
'0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e',
'0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d',
'0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a',
'0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e',
'0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd'
)
)
Uniswap V1 condition: to_address = '0x2157a7894439191e520825fe9399ab8655e0f708' Uniswap V2 condition: SUBSTR(input, 1, 10) = '0x022c0d9f'
We found 4935 unique transaction 1inch tx originators who missed UNI airdrop but used Uniswap internally.
SELECT
DISTINCT from_address
FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.transactions
WHERE hash IN (
SELECT transaction_hash FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces
WHERE DATE(block_timestamp) < "2020-09-01" AND (SUBSTR(input, 1, 10) = '0x022c0d9f' OR to_address = '0x2157a7894439191e520825fe9399ab8655e0f708')
INTERSECT DISTINCT
SELECT transaction_hash FROM bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces
WHERE DATE(block_timestamp) < "2020-09-01" AND to_address IN (
'0x0000000053d411becdb4a82d8603edc6d8b8b3bc',
'0x0000000f8ef4be2b7aed6724e893c1b674b9682d',
'0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781',
'0x0000000006adbd7c01bc0738cdbfc3932600ad63',
'0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b',
'0x000005edbbc1f258302add96b5e20d3442e5dd89',
'0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f',
'0xe4c577bdec9ce0f6c54f2f82aed5b1913b71ae2f',
'0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e',
'0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d',
'0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a',
'0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e',
'0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd'
)
)
Uniswap V1 condition: to_address = '0x2157a7894439191e520825fe9399ab8655e0f708' Uniswap V2 condition: SUBSTR(input, 1, 10) = '0x022c0d9f'
Addresses: github . com/CryptoManiacsZone/1inch-uni-addresses/blob/master/users_filtered.csv
hey djalle can you send me your address so I can check? if you don't want to post it here, you can submit it as an issue on that github repo
List of Excluded Users: hxxps://github.com/nedodn/DEXAG_UNI_ADDRESSES/blob/master/excludedUNIAddresses.json
Hallo nedodn,
I've used DEX.AG > Uniswap for some swaps, but my address is not included in the list. Maybe could you check why is not included?
Thanks a lot
responded to that address.
Adding in DEXAG's list of excluded users as well as our script. (had to defang the links since it won't let me post links for some reason)
List of Excluded Users: hxxps://github.com/nedodn/DEXAG_UNI_ADDRESSES/blob/master/excludedUNIAddresses.json
Link to Script: hxxps://github.com/nedodn/DEXAG_UNI_ADDRESSES/blob/master/getUniAddresses.js
hey djalle can you send me your address so I can check? if you don’t want to post it here, you can submit it as an issue on that github repo
thanks a lot for your answer, maybe could I send you a private message in some way? you could answer me here if it is possible: [email protected]
Affected addresses of MEW gist.github[.]com/kvhnuke/966b1876f4c50029289003a66b88d6a6
it seems like I cant post any links
Hey ya’ll! Alexis from Opyn here.
Here are the affected addresses that were not already in the initial airdrop: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIkjzLhzF53tSt--_wHGEW92sWY3bZQY35h_qLEmY9Q/edit?usp=sharing
Here is the GitHub code snippet: https://github.com/haythem96/opyn-kpi/blob/feature/uni-addresses/getInteractedAddressesWithUniswap.js
(I wasn't able to add direct links to the post)
Aragon Court
The onboarding site for Aragon Court jurors: anj.aragon.org
(I wasn't able to add direct links to the post)
Aragon Court
The onboarding site for Aragon Court jurors: anj.aragon.org
0x0EbDB778b88D73B2C513B53849724d8F30363Cc2
(Via Uniswap v1)
Difficult to say without cross-referencing whether all the addresses had already been included in the initial airdrop, but ~250 unique addresses have used this interface to swap into ANJ through Uniswap v1.
Hi can you help me maybe with a Problem, i connected my trust wallet with uniswap and swap my eth into ampleforth but the Problem is that the swap run through kyber network and i dont know why... now i cant claim my uni...
Bom dia. Estou muito confuso. Levei alguns dias para chegar até aqui. Pode me ajudar?
I've verified that a couple of addresses you've above will be included in our list.
On another note, we have 30,250 addresses in total, after filtering claimed addresses. The reason why it increased from the initial amount in my previous post is because I wrote a Dune Analytics query to fetch the addresses, which lacked addresses trading through our new Kyber proxy contract (0x9aab3f75489902f3a48495025729a0af77d4b11e).
I've verified that a couple of addresses you've above will be included in our list.
On another note, we have 30,250 addresses in total, after filtering claimed addresses. The reason why it increased from the initial amount in my previous post is because I wrote a Dune Analytics query to fetch the addresses, which lacked addresses trading through our new Kyber proxy contract (0x9aab3f75489902f3a48495025729a0af77d4b11e).
We have since wrote a custom script to supplement the dune analytics query, fetching the data using a local node.
I believe that a substantial no. of addresses will overlap with some projects as well (Eg. 1inch, Argent etc.) since they have integrated us for the token swaps.
Nome do projeto: kyber { "Txhash": "0x7c796f5ff9288f546004ee6cc69e2655b9991614510bc975044e3a9cec036a56", "Blockno": 10710797, "UnixTimestamp": 1598109324, "DateTime": "2020-08-22 15:15:24", "From": "0x0681d8db095565fe8a346fa0277bffde9c0edbbf", "To": "0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb", "ContractAddress": "", "Value_IN(ETH)": 0.72615, "Value_OUT(ETH)": 0, "CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth": 251.68359, "TxnFee(ETH)": 0.002352, "TxnFee(USD)": 0.8152032, "Historical $Price/Eth": 395.46, "Status": "", "ErrCode": "" }, { "Txhash": "0x159c10f60b8f2778922d94ceda76417f011562cb1e7abf7b74dfc50e42da3a87", "Blockno": 10725670, "UnixTimestamp": 1598306026, "DateTime": "2020-08-24 21:53:46", "From": "0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb", "To": "0x9aab3f75489902f3a48495025729a0af77d4b11e", "ContractAddress": "", "Value_IN(ETH)": 0, "Value_OUT(ETH)": 0.5436125, "CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth": 188.4160925, "TxnFee(ETH)": 0.035779916, "TxnFee(USD)": 12.4013188856, "Historical $Price/Eth": 408.03, "Status": "", "ErrCode": "" }, { "Txhash": "0x23e82823da716b4162495b566ccf1725586ceeec6146433d26339538703448dc", "Blockno": 10742596, "UnixTimestamp": 1598531401, "DateTime": "2020-08-27 12:30:01", "From": "0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb", "To": "0xcab5174d29433d631f70f462709ef2b20e7aa916", "ContractAddress": "", "Value_IN(ETH)": 0, "Value_OUT(ETH)": 0.144615584, "CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth": 50.1237614144, "TxnFee(ETH)": 0.002142, "TxnFee(USD)": 0.7424172, "Historical $Price/Eth": 383.18, "Status": "", "ErrCode": "" } ]
Estou perdido. Alguém me ajuda?
I've double checked, there is some overlap with kyber's list, but still a total of 1247 Argent users not included in kyber's list.
How did they try to bypass uniswap?
Regardless, stop your accusations.
Não falo, mais uso o translate
0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap 0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781 -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000f8eF4be2B7AeD6724e893c1b674B9682D -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x000005eDbbc1f258302aDd96B5E20D3442E5DD89 -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000053D411bEcDb4A82D8603eDC6d8B8b3Bc -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000006ADBd7c01Bc0738cDBFc3932600Ad63 -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0xE4C577bdEc9cE0F6c54f2f82AED5b1913B71AE2f -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation
hey djalle can you send me your address so I can check? if you don’t want to post it here, you can submit it as an issue on that github repo
thanks a lot for your answer, maybe could I send you a private message in some way? you could answer me here if it is possible: [email protected]
Affected addresses of MEW gist.github[.]com/kvhnuke/966b1876f4c50029289003a66b88d6a6
it seems like I cant post any links
Hey ya’ll! Alexis from Opyn here.
Here are the affected addresses that were not already in the initial airdrop: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIkjzLhzF53tSt--_wHGEW92sWY3bZQY35h_qLEmY9Q/edit?usp=sharing
Here is the GitHub code snippet: https://github.com/haythem96/opyn-kpi/blob/feature/uni-addresses/getInteractedAddressesWithUniswap.js
(I wasn't able to add direct links to the post)
Aragon Court
The onboarding site for Aragon Court jurors: anj.aragon.org
(I wasn't able to add direct links to the post)
Aragon Court
The onboarding site for Aragon Court jurors: anj.aragon.org
0x0EbDB778b88D73B2C513B53849724d8F30363Cc2
(Via Uniswap v1)
Difficult to say without cross-referencing whether all the addresses had already been included in the initial airdrop, but ~250 unique addresses have used this interface to swap into ANJ through Uniswap v1.
Hi can you help me maybe with a Problem, i connected my trust wallet with uniswap and swap my eth into ampleforth but the Problem is that the swap run through kyber network and i dont know why... now i cant claim my uni...
Bom dia. Estou muito confuso. Levei alguns dias para chegar até aqui. Pode me ajudar?
I've verified that a couple of addresses you've above will be included in our list.
On another note, we have 30,250 addresses in total, after filtering claimed addresses. The reason why it increased from the initial amount in my previous post is because I wrote a Dune Analytics query to fetch the addresses, which lacked addresses trading through our new Kyber proxy contract (0x9aab3f75489902f3a48495025729a0af77d4b11e).
I've verified that a couple of addresses you've above will be included in our list.
On another note, we have 30,250 addresses in total, after filtering claimed addresses. The reason why it increased from the initial amount in my previous post is because I wrote a Dune Analytics query to fetch the addresses, which lacked addresses trading through our new Kyber proxy contract (0x9aab3f75489902f3a48495025729a0af77d4b11e).
We have since wrote a custom script to supplement the dune analytics query, fetching the data using a local node.
I believe that a substantial no. of addresses will overlap with some projects as well (Eg. 1inch, Argent etc.) since they have integrated us for the token swaps.
Nome do projeto: kyber { "Txhash": "0x7c796f5ff9288f546004ee6cc69e2655b9991614510bc975044e3a9cec036a56", "Blockno": 10710797, "UnixTimestamp": 1598109324, "DateTime": "2020-08-22 15:15:24", "From": "0x0681d8db095565fe8a346fa0277bffde9c0edbbf", "To": "0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb", "ContractAddress": "", "Value_IN(ETH)": 0.72615, "Value_OUT(ETH)": 0, "CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth": 251.68359, "TxnFee(ETH)": 0.002352, "TxnFee(USD)": 0.8152032, "Historical $Price/Eth": 395.46, "Status": "", "ErrCode": "" }, { "Txhash": "0x159c10f60b8f2778922d94ceda76417f011562cb1e7abf7b74dfc50e42da3a87", "Blockno": 10725670, "UnixTimestamp": 1598306026, "DateTime": "2020-08-24 21:53:46", "From": "0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb", "To": "0x9aab3f75489902f3a48495025729a0af77d4b11e", "ContractAddress": "", "Value_IN(ETH)": 0, "Value_OUT(ETH)": 0.5436125, "CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth": 188.4160925, "TxnFee(ETH)": 0.035779916, "TxnFee(USD)": 12.4013188856, "Historical $Price/Eth": 408.03, "Status": "", "ErrCode": "" }, { "Txhash": "0x23e82823da716b4162495b566ccf1725586ceeec6146433d26339538703448dc", "Blockno": 10742596, "UnixTimestamp": 1598531401, "DateTime": "2020-08-27 12:30:01", "From": "0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb", "To": "0xcab5174d29433d631f70f462709ef2b20e7aa916", "ContractAddress": "", "Value_IN(ETH)": 0, "Value_OUT(ETH)": 0.144615584, "CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth": 50.1237614144, "TxnFee(ETH)": 0.002142, "TxnFee(USD)": 0.7424172, "Historical $Price/Eth": 383.18, "Status": "", "ErrCode": "" } ]
Estou perdido. Alguém me ajuda?
I've double checked, there is some overlap with kyber's list, but still a total of 1247 Argent users not included in kyber's list.
How did they try to bypass uniswap?
Regardless, stop your accusations.
Não falo, mais uso o translate
0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap 0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781 -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000f8eF4be2B7AeD6724e893c1b674B9682D -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x000005eDbbc1f258302aDd96B5E20D3442E5DD89 -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000053D411bEcDb4A82D8603eDC6d8B8b3Bc -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000006ADBd7c01Bc0738cDBFc3932600Ad63 -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0xE4C577bdEc9cE0F6c54f2f82AED5b1913B71AE2f -> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd -> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation
Hi everyone, Andrew from Opyn here. Realize we’re a bit behind the deadline and just realized this proposal was active! Would love to still participate if possible. I'm unable post with links, so will leave them as text for now.
Opyn
Hi everyone, Andrew from Opyn here. Realize we’re a bit behind the deadline and just realized this proposal was active! Would love to still participate if possible. I'm unable post with links, so will leave them as text for now.
Opyn
https://medium.com/opyn/providing-insurance-on-opyn-b370e67a709a
https://etherscan.io/address/0x5778f2824a114f6115dc74d432685d3336216017
https://etherscan.io/address/0x39246c4f3f6592c974ebc44f80ba6dc69b817c71
~600
Thanks!
I’ve contacted Kyber to confirm as they might have included our module as a single user. I’ll update as soon as we have confirmation.
Two more contract links that weren't able to be posted due to the two link limit:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x932348DF588923bA3F1Fd50593B22C4e2A287919 https://etherscan.io/address/0xa540fb50288cc31639305b1675c70763c334953b
Nome do projeto Kyber 0x0d1F5c8309e73eEB43d76aA5Ac40c286CcF5a91B
Growdrop
https://medium.com/growfi/tagged/growdrop
Growdrop
https://medium.com/growfi/tagged/growdrop
https://etherscan.io/address/0x98117E9D8AbCFF8c67B7A848B87B044f8A31D3dF
https://etherscan.io/address/0x38772B4Ff35d679EcD56862418CA4bb4e1918Ece
~10
Sorry for late request.
Rebalance.to
https://etherscan.io/address/0x1c3031e02e9a0ec237f5bd674eaaa5e56a2ae174
Rebalance.to
https://etherscan.io/address/0x1c3031e02e9a0ec237f5bd674eaaa5e56a2ae174
about 7
Hey! Half of them are our main aggregation smart contracts and the half is on chain aggregation contracts 1split. We deployed multiple versions over time.
DEX.AG
https://twitter.com/DEXAG_TokenWire/status/1276228857033621505
Itamar, since Argent's trades are executed by Kyber, and Kyber has submitted a separate application for inclusion, I believe Argent's users would be a sub-set of Kyber's. Could you confirm if that's correct?
Kyber
We integrated with Uniswap in early 2019.
Furucombo
We've integrated Uniswap from our day 1 launched, this tweet is a example shows how we use it. (to prove we have Uniswap V1/V2)
Hi everyone, Andrew from Opyn here. Realize we’re a bit behind the deadline and just realized this proposal was active! Would love to still participate if possible. I'm unable post with links, so will leave them as text for now.
Opyn
Hi everyone, Andrew from Opyn here. Realize we’re a bit behind the deadline and just realized this proposal was active! Would love to still participate if possible. I'm unable post with links, so will leave them as text for now.
Opyn
https://medium.com/opyn/providing-insurance-on-opyn-b370e67a709a
https://etherscan.io/address/0x5778f2824a114f6115dc74d432685d3336216017
https://etherscan.io/address/0x39246c4f3f6592c974ebc44f80ba6dc69b817c71
~600
Thanks!
I’ve contacted Kyber to confirm as they might have included our module as a single user. I’ll update as soon as we have confirmation.
Two more contract links that weren't able to be posted due to the two link limit:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x932348DF588923bA3F1Fd50593B22C4e2A287919 https://etherscan.io/address/0xa540fb50288cc31639305b1675c70763c334953b
Nome do projeto Kyber 0x0d1F5c8309e73eEB43d76aA5Ac40c286CcF5a91B
Growdrop
https://medium.com/growfi/tagged/growdrop
Growdrop
https://medium.com/growfi/tagged/growdrop
https://etherscan.io/address/0x98117E9D8AbCFF8c67B7A848B87B044f8A31D3dF
https://etherscan.io/address/0x38772B4Ff35d679EcD56862418CA4bb4e1918Ece
~10
Sorry for late request.
Rebalance.to
https://etherscan.io/address/0x1c3031e02e9a0ec237f5bd674eaaa5e56a2ae174
Rebalance.to
https://etherscan.io/address/0x1c3031e02e9a0ec237f5bd674eaaa5e56a2ae174
about 7
Hey! Half of them are our main aggregation smart contracts and the half is on chain aggregation contracts 1split. We deployed multiple versions over time.
DEX.AG
https://twitter.com/DEXAG_TokenWire/status/1276228857033621505
Itamar, since Argent's trades are executed by Kyber, and Kyber has submitted a separate application for inclusion, I believe Argent's users would be a sub-set of Kyber's. Could you confirm if that's correct?
Kyber
We integrated with Uniswap in early 2019.
Furucombo
We've integrated Uniswap from our day 1 launched, this tweet is a example shows how we use it. (to prove we have Uniswap V1/V2)
DEX.AG
https://twitter.com/DEXAG_TokenWire/status/1276228857033621505
https://etherscan.io/address/0x745daa146934b27e3f0b6bff1a6e36b9b90fb131
~2000-3000
Kyber
We integrated with Uniswap in early 2019.
We have had a few bridge reserves over time: Katalyst Bridge (UniV2, active): 0x10908c875d865c66f271f5d3949848971c9595c9 Pre-Katalyst, UniV2: 0x80827ce0d1b23ac2f30b4244d27b0aa904bda83c v4, UniV1: 0x31e085afd48a1d6e51cc193153d625e8f0514c7f v3, UniV1: 0x54a4a1167b004b004520c605e3f01906f683413d v2, UniV1: 0x5d154c145db2ca90b8ab5e8fe3e716afa4ab7ff0 v1, UniV1: 0x13032deb2d37556cf49301f713e9d7e1d1a8b169
≈ 23,143 (without initial airdrop exclusion)
Furucombo
We've integrated Uniswap from our day 1 launched, this tweet is a example shows how we use it. (to prove we have Uniswap V1/V2)
https://twitter.com/furucombo/status/1243467352072531969
We have 4 versions of proxy contract, latest one: v0.4.1 https://etherscan.io/address/0x57805e5a227937bac2b0fdacaa30413ddac6b8e1
3 others:
v0.1 0x52f9eea36f57d86a0f051419fd11e4a256359c8f v0.2 0x710b80571db3792fbf4df7763efa6548c25a1635 v0.4 0x9cc76b94c005d7ce45623ce5707a5f19dc513662
≈ 409 wallets
We’ll be following up with the exact number later today.
All primaries that have had meaningful usage: 0x7113dd99c79aff93d54cfa4b2885576535a132de 0x3179e4cd7ff08eb14397e1c402d0de44e1523f2e 0x3b21d6d25e7f036c8277efe9a7ebf17ca12fe4f6 0x77208a6000691e440026bed1b178ef4661d37426 0xc755af998e8c50d6df1779ce3d7e4084a17b4c56
Absolutely NOT. Will be voting no and encouraging all others UNISWAP members to vote no as well. You try to bypass Uniswap and now you want UNI tokens? Funny. Not a chance.
https://cn.etherscan.com/tx/0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521?locale=zh-CN&utm_source=imtoken Transaction Hash:
0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521
https://cn.etherscan.com/tx/0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521?locale=zh-CN&utm_source=imtoken Transaction Hash:
0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521
The Address 0xBf592177E1918ABEC7c9D435157b76f52601DdB4 page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and make transactions to the contract directly on...
Thanks for the clarity.
What is the name of your project?
Lunch Money
Lunch Money has used Uniswap to provide liquidy for LMY since 2019.
Link of Lunch Money use:
“Restaurant and the Unicorn, a tale of Use” by Lunch Money https://link.medium.com/UHXP0ADmW9
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed:
Link to V2 Dex trades:
We have additional proxy contracts for Totle that should be considered:
0x06ce5dc3ea86e0342ef2a991b4e27105b48b50ab 0x090133646f0d7cb9d5fb3669015e248dd38719b2 0x2bdaaffb8137d3403ccef57c6c11a206ebf89860 0x3179e4cd7ff08eb14397e1c402d0de44e1523f2e 0x37629db35889e1e87dcee07b171efd565e571e05 0x3b21d6d25e7f036c8277efe9a7ebf17ca12fe4f6 0x3ecd6691c1e194f03e8c68d9884eda9a0f237eef 0x45e773512bbf4ef5c34f9852e9630e3109f00c36 0x5a7785d3b7ec2f04bd0d5af02461603f993c2e4d 0x623520377f092c1c70bd57d17ae9ede6a288412c 0x7113dd99c79aff93d54cfa4b2885576535a132de 0x77208a6000691e440026bed1b178ef4661d37426 0x7de16ef2d4e6b4b0a3543df91aefea1f8333b2cf 0xc755af998e8c50d6df1779ce3d7e4084a17b4c56 0xcd2053679de3bcf2b7e2c2efb6b499c57701222c
What is the name of your project?
1inch.exchange
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
https://1inch.exchange https://medium.com/@1inch.exchange/1inch-integrates-uniswap-v2-protocol-35f628fa73f4
Also, the first Uniswap v1 version has been running on 1inch website since the beginning of our DAPP--since May 2019.
What is the name of your project?
Eidoo
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Tweet announcing the launch of the feature on Jan 16, 2020
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
Ok thanks for the ans and sorry for my confusion, we can add liquidity and work normally?
DEX.AG
https://twitter.com/DEXAG_TokenWire/status/1276228857033621505
https://etherscan.io/address/0x745daa146934b27e3f0b6bff1a6e36b9b90fb131
~2000-3000
Kyber
We integrated with Uniswap in early 2019.
We have had a few bridge reserves over time: Katalyst Bridge (UniV2, active): 0x10908c875d865c66f271f5d3949848971c9595c9 Pre-Katalyst, UniV2: 0x80827ce0d1b23ac2f30b4244d27b0aa904bda83c v4, UniV1: 0x31e085afd48a1d6e51cc193153d625e8f0514c7f v3, UniV1: 0x54a4a1167b004b004520c605e3f01906f683413d v2, UniV1: 0x5d154c145db2ca90b8ab5e8fe3e716afa4ab7ff0 v1, UniV1: 0x13032deb2d37556cf49301f713e9d7e1d1a8b169
≈ 23,143 (without initial airdrop exclusion)
Furucombo
We've integrated Uniswap from our day 1 launched, this tweet is a example shows how we use it. (to prove we have Uniswap V1/V2)
https://twitter.com/furucombo/status/1243467352072531969
We have 4 versions of proxy contract, latest one: v0.4.1 https://etherscan.io/address/0x57805e5a227937bac2b0fdacaa30413ddac6b8e1
3 others:
v0.1 0x52f9eea36f57d86a0f051419fd11e4a256359c8f v0.2 0x710b80571db3792fbf4df7763efa6548c25a1635 v0.4 0x9cc76b94c005d7ce45623ce5707a5f19dc513662
≈ 409 wallets
We’ll be following up with the exact number later today.
All primaries that have had meaningful usage: 0x7113dd99c79aff93d54cfa4b2885576535a132de 0x3179e4cd7ff08eb14397e1c402d0de44e1523f2e 0x3b21d6d25e7f036c8277efe9a7ebf17ca12fe4f6 0x77208a6000691e440026bed1b178ef4661d37426 0xc755af998e8c50d6df1779ce3d7e4084a17b4c56
Absolutely NOT. Will be voting no and encouraging all others UNISWAP members to vote no as well. You try to bypass Uniswap and now you want UNI tokens? Funny. Not a chance.
https://cn.etherscan.com/tx/0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521?locale=zh-CN&utm_source=imtoken Transaction Hash:
0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521
https://cn.etherscan.com/tx/0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521?locale=zh-CN&utm_source=imtoken Transaction Hash:
0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521
The Address 0xBf592177E1918ABEC7c9D435157b76f52601DdB4 page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and make transactions to the contract directly on...
Thanks for the clarity.
What is the name of your project?
Lunch Money
Lunch Money has used Uniswap to provide liquidy for LMY since 2019.
Link of Lunch Money use:
“Restaurant and the Unicorn, a tale of Use” by Lunch Money https://link.medium.com/UHXP0ADmW9
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed:
Link to V2 Dex trades:
We have additional proxy contracts for Totle that should be considered:
0x06ce5dc3ea86e0342ef2a991b4e27105b48b50ab 0x090133646f0d7cb9d5fb3669015e248dd38719b2 0x2bdaaffb8137d3403ccef57c6c11a206ebf89860 0x3179e4cd7ff08eb14397e1c402d0de44e1523f2e 0x37629db35889e1e87dcee07b171efd565e571e05 0x3b21d6d25e7f036c8277efe9a7ebf17ca12fe4f6 0x3ecd6691c1e194f03e8c68d9884eda9a0f237eef 0x45e773512bbf4ef5c34f9852e9630e3109f00c36 0x5a7785d3b7ec2f04bd0d5af02461603f993c2e4d 0x623520377f092c1c70bd57d17ae9ede6a288412c 0x7113dd99c79aff93d54cfa4b2885576535a132de 0x77208a6000691e440026bed1b178ef4661d37426 0x7de16ef2d4e6b4b0a3543df91aefea1f8333b2cf 0xc755af998e8c50d6df1779ce3d7e4084a17b4c56 0xcd2053679de3bcf2b7e2c2efb6b499c57701222c
What is the name of your project?
1inch.exchange
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
https://1inch.exchange https://medium.com/@1inch.exchange/1inch-integrates-uniswap-v2-protocol-35f628fa73f4
Also, the first Uniswap v1 version has been running on 1inch website since the beginning of our DAPP--since May 2019.
What is the name of your project?
Eidoo
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Tweet announcing the launch of the feature on Jan 16, 2020
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
Ok thanks for the ans and sorry for my confusion, we can add liquidity and work normally?
What is the name of your project?
Lunch Money
Lunch Money has used Uniswap to provide liquidy for LMY since 2019.
Link of Lunch Money use:
“Restaurant and the Unicorn, a tale of Use” by Lunch Money https://link.medium.com/UHXP0ADmW9
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed:
Link to V2 Dex trades:
https://etherscan.io/dextracker?filter=39&q=LMY
Link to V1 Dex trades:
" "/dextracker?filter=28&q=LMY
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
Addresses:
Not sure how many but appears possibly 20-30
What is the name of your project?
1inch.exchange
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
https://1inch.exchange https://medium.com/@1inch.exchange/1inch-integrates-uniswap-v2-protocol-35f628fa73f4
Also, the first Uniswap v1 version has been running on 1inch website since the beginning of our DAPP--since May 2019.
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed:
The following links contain our four Uniswap wrapper contracts through which user-initiated actions were routed:
0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b 0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781 0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f 0x0000000f8eF4be2B7AeD6724e893c1b674B9682D 0x000005eDbbc1f258302aDd96B5E20D3442E5DD89 0x0000000053D411bEcDb4A82D8603eDC6d8B8b3Bc 0x0000000006ADBd7c01Bc0738cDBFc3932600Ad63 0xE4C577bdEc9cE0F6c54f2f82AED5b1913B71AE2f 0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e 0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d 0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a 0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e 0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
≈25000
It is difficult to estimate the exact number of users, but the 1inch smart contracts have always sent a large amount of volume through Uniswap.
What is the name of your project?
Eidoo
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Tweet announcing the launch of the feature on Jan 16, 2020
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
Unfortunately being a new user it doesn't let me add more than 2 links so I will just list the addresses of the 3 proxy contracts here:
0xa7327e2f824ca49c95390d288aae54c671c67333 0x35596efadd677A83cA34F2B361A42704DaBE7b91 0xe5b96c7c723460174826038408fc772ea4f4c182
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
310
Abuse? What an assumption versus a simple misunderstanding. We can't speak for Agave but if Lunch Money misunderstood the guidelines. Our ineligibilty is quite clear.
yea we use a copy of the DEX.AG contract, so the actual contract used by dex.ag is different from ours. I will also let DEX.AG team know to submit a separate application.
Totle Totle.exchange https://etherscan.io/tx/0x251daf83497897b221e9c599e36ab209d31c503a177aa988d3c8cf25ef492347 1000-1800 users
Agavecoin , AGVC
https://twitter.com/agave_coin/status/1224726746550812672
-Uniswap v2
Agavecoin , AGVC
https://twitter.com/agave_coin/status/1224726746550812672
-Uniswap v2
Removed the liquidity for a problem with other exchanges, now is not possible add liquidity because not shows.
1000-1500
ParaSwap
Uniswap was integrated since day 1 on paraswap.io
ParaSwap
Uniswap was integrated since day 1 on paraswap.io
https://etherscan.io/address/0x86969d29f5fd327e1009ba66072be22db6017cc6 As well previous contract versions 0xf92c1ad75005e6436b4ee84e88cb23ed8a290988 0x6b158039b9678b7452f311deb12dd08c579dad26 0x72338b82800400f5488eca2b5a37270ba3b7a111
≈2,000 - 2,500 users
I am a user affected by the proxy contract omission .I could not find who to contact with the kyber network team and the aragon team I could send an e-mail. I just don't know who will help me
Adding 2 additional links due to new user's # of link limitation https://etherscan.io/address/0xba30a255a23fc6e864f1195eaccedf1eeac9a64c https://etherscan.io/address/0xb76c291871b92a7c9e020b2511a3402a3bf0499d
MyEtherWallet & MEW wallet
Hey there, Fulvia from 0x Labs here. I'm applying on behalf of 0x API and its integrators.
What is the name of your project? 0x API
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st API launch blogpost on January 28th
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed Account proxy factory -> https://etherscan.io/address/0x4e9d7f37eadc6fef64b5f5dccc4deb6224667677#code
What is the name of your project?
Lunch Money
Lunch Money has used Uniswap to provide liquidy for LMY since 2019.
Link of Lunch Money use:
“Restaurant and the Unicorn, a tale of Use” by Lunch Money https://link.medium.com/UHXP0ADmW9
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed:
Link to V2 Dex trades:
https://etherscan.io/dextracker?filter=39&q=LMY
Link to V1 Dex trades:
" "/dextracker?filter=28&q=LMY
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
Addresses:
Not sure how many but appears possibly 20-30
What is the name of your project?
1inch.exchange
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
https://1inch.exchange https://medium.com/@1inch.exchange/1inch-integrates-uniswap-v2-protocol-35f628fa73f4
Also, the first Uniswap v1 version has been running on 1inch website since the beginning of our DAPP--since May 2019.
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed:
The following links contain our four Uniswap wrapper contracts through which user-initiated actions were routed:
0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b 0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781 0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f 0x0000000f8eF4be2B7AeD6724e893c1b674B9682D 0x000005eDbbc1f258302aDd96B5E20D3442E5DD89 0x0000000053D411bEcDb4A82D8603eDC6d8B8b3Bc 0x0000000006ADBd7c01Bc0738cDBFc3932600Ad63 0xE4C577bdEc9cE0F6c54f2f82AED5b1913B71AE2f 0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e 0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d 0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a 0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e 0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
≈25000
It is difficult to estimate the exact number of users, but the 1inch smart contracts have always sent a large amount of volume through Uniswap.
What is the name of your project?
Eidoo
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Tweet announcing the launch of the feature on Jan 16, 2020
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
Unfortunately being a new user it doesn't let me add more than 2 links so I will just list the addresses of the 3 proxy contracts here:
0xa7327e2f824ca49c95390d288aae54c671c67333 0x35596efadd677A83cA34F2B361A42704DaBE7b91 0xe5b96c7c723460174826038408fc772ea4f4c182
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
310
Abuse? What an assumption versus a simple misunderstanding. We can't speak for Agave but if Lunch Money misunderstood the guidelines. Our ineligibilty is quite clear.
yea we use a copy of the DEX.AG contract, so the actual contract used by dex.ag is different from ours. I will also let DEX.AG team know to submit a separate application.
Totle Totle.exchange https://etherscan.io/tx/0x251daf83497897b221e9c599e36ab209d31c503a177aa988d3c8cf25ef492347 1000-1800 users
Agavecoin , AGVC
https://twitter.com/agave_coin/status/1224726746550812672
-Uniswap v2
Agavecoin , AGVC
https://twitter.com/agave_coin/status/1224726746550812672
-Uniswap v2
Removed the liquidity for a problem with other exchanges, now is not possible add liquidity because not shows.
1000-1500
ParaSwap
Uniswap was integrated since day 1 on paraswap.io
ParaSwap
Uniswap was integrated since day 1 on paraswap.io
https://etherscan.io/address/0x86969d29f5fd327e1009ba66072be22db6017cc6 As well previous contract versions 0xf92c1ad75005e6436b4ee84e88cb23ed8a290988 0x6b158039b9678b7452f311deb12dd08c579dad26 0x72338b82800400f5488eca2b5a37270ba3b7a111
≈2,000 - 2,500 users
I am a user affected by the proxy contract omission .I could not find who to contact with the kyber network team and the aragon team I could send an e-mail. I just don't know who will help me
Adding 2 additional links due to new user's # of link limitation https://etherscan.io/address/0xba30a255a23fc6e864f1195eaccedf1eeac9a64c https://etherscan.io/address/0xb76c291871b92a7c9e020b2511a3402a3bf0499d
MyEtherWallet & MEW wallet
Hey there, Fulvia from 0x Labs here. I'm applying on behalf of 0x API and its integrators.
What is the name of your project? 0x API
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st API launch blogpost on January 28th
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed Account proxy factory -> https://etherscan.io/address/0x4e9d7f37eadc6fef64b5f5dccc4deb6224667677#code
MyEtherWallet & MEW wallet
https://etherscan.io/address/0x01e176828454368f60898f04025dce3bcfe76ab5
≈7000+
Hey there, Fulvia from 0x Labs here. I'm applying on behalf of 0x API and its integrators.
What is the name of your project? 0x API
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st API launch blogpost on January 28th
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed Exchange Proxy: https://etherscan.io/address/0xdef1c0ded9bec7f1a1670819833240f027b25eff 0x Exchange v3: https://etherscan.io/address/0x61935cbdd02287b511119ddb11aeb42f1593b7ef Uniswap V1 bridge: https://etherscan.io/address/0x36691c4f426eb8f42f150ebde43069a31cb080ad Uniswap V2 bridge: https://etherscan.io/address/0xdcd6011f4c6b80e470d9487f5871a0cba7c93f48/ Flash Wallet: https://etherscan.io/address/0x22f9dcf4647084d6c31b2765f6910cd85c178c18
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root. ~400
Our case is different as no users were directly impacted. What happened is that we sent our Liquidity Tokens to a Vault. The vault contract got the tokens of course but we're unable to withdraw. If these tokens can be considered as burned and new tokens were sent to the contract CREATOR it would be enough.
Regards, EasySwap.
CryptoAds
huniswap pair 0x21DeD51F7b111B74259D6075829227e520970470 0xd883926830cc566f8ecc415ae6513d2829422574
CryptoAds
huniswap pair 0x21DeD51F7b111B74259D6075829227e520970470 0xd883926830cc566f8ecc415ae6513d2829422574
0x608f006b6813f97097372d0d31fb0f11d1ca3e4e 0xd883926830cc566f8ecc415ae6513d2829422574
10
Monolith
The blog post announcing our integration of ParaSwap in June.
Monolith
The blog post announcing our integration of ParaSwap in June.
ParaSwap's contract (integrated in our app) - https://etherscan.io/address/0x86969d29f5fd327e1009ba66072be22db6017cc6
The current estimation is around 200
Hi, CryptoAssasin
Note that this recommendation is for Projects and Applications rather than for individual users. I don't think you need to individually answer this topic. Maybe if you contact AMPL or Mooniswap via Twitter or another channel, they will be aware of this proposal.
I wish you have a nice day.
What is the name of your project? Nuo Network
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st Dex aggregator launch -> twitter.com/getnuo/status/1247247721682972678 Margin trade launch -> https://twitter.com/getnuo/status/1097997523870900224
What is the name of your project? Nuo Network
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st Dex aggregator launch -> twitter.com/getnuo/status/1247247721682972678 Margin trade launch -> https://twitter.com/getnuo/status/1097997523870900224
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkel root. ~ 3000 users
This specific post is for Projects/Apps (by the title) not for Individuals, as many admins have said on here this forum isn't a place for support support questions should instead be directed to the Uniswap Discord
Just to confirm for everyone in the thread, too: We have submitted the PR and our application is available here: https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users/tree/master/projects/DeFi%20Saver
MyEtherWallet & MEW wallet
https://etherscan.io/address/0x01e176828454368f60898f04025dce3bcfe76ab5
≈7000+
Hey there, Fulvia from 0x Labs here. I'm applying on behalf of 0x API and its integrators.
What is the name of your project? 0x API
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st API launch blogpost on January 28th
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed Exchange Proxy: https://etherscan.io/address/0xdef1c0ded9bec7f1a1670819833240f027b25eff 0x Exchange v3: https://etherscan.io/address/0x61935cbdd02287b511119ddb11aeb42f1593b7ef Uniswap V1 bridge: https://etherscan.io/address/0x36691c4f426eb8f42f150ebde43069a31cb080ad Uniswap V2 bridge: https://etherscan.io/address/0xdcd6011f4c6b80e470d9487f5871a0cba7c93f48/ Flash Wallet: https://etherscan.io/address/0x22f9dcf4647084d6c31b2765f6910cd85c178c18
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root. ~400
Our case is different as no users were directly impacted. What happened is that we sent our Liquidity Tokens to a Vault. The vault contract got the tokens of course but we're unable to withdraw. If these tokens can be considered as burned and new tokens were sent to the contract CREATOR it would be enough.
Regards, EasySwap.
CryptoAds
huniswap pair 0x21DeD51F7b111B74259D6075829227e520970470 0xd883926830cc566f8ecc415ae6513d2829422574
CryptoAds
huniswap pair 0x21DeD51F7b111B74259D6075829227e520970470 0xd883926830cc566f8ecc415ae6513d2829422574
0x608f006b6813f97097372d0d31fb0f11d1ca3e4e 0xd883926830cc566f8ecc415ae6513d2829422574
10
Monolith
The blog post announcing our integration of ParaSwap in June.
Monolith
The blog post announcing our integration of ParaSwap in June.
ParaSwap's contract (integrated in our app) - https://etherscan.io/address/0x86969d29f5fd327e1009ba66072be22db6017cc6
The current estimation is around 200
Hi, CryptoAssasin
Note that this recommendation is for Projects and Applications rather than for individual users. I don't think you need to individually answer this topic. Maybe if you contact AMPL or Mooniswap via Twitter or another channel, they will be aware of this proposal.
I wish you have a nice day.
What is the name of your project? Nuo Network
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st Dex aggregator launch -> twitter.com/getnuo/status/1247247721682972678 Margin trade launch -> https://twitter.com/getnuo/status/1097997523870900224
What is the name of your project? Nuo Network
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st Dex aggregator launch -> twitter.com/getnuo/status/1247247721682972678 Margin trade launch -> https://twitter.com/getnuo/status/1097997523870900224
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkel root. ~ 3000 users
This specific post is for Projects/Apps (by the title) not for Individuals, as many admins have said on here this forum isn't a place for support support questions should instead be directed to the Uniswap Discord
Just to confirm for everyone in the thread, too: We have submitted the PR and our application is available here: https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users/tree/master/projects/DeFi%20Saver
The final number of affected accounts that were using DeFi Saver should be 605. (This is after checks against the previous UNI airdrop list of accounts, but not against any other submissions here.)
List of accounts in .json: https://github.com/Jay-Prime/dfs-uniswap/blob/master/defisaver_accounts.json
The final number of affected accounts that were using DeFi Saver should be 605. (This is after checks against the previous UNI airdrop list of accounts, but not against any other submissions here.)
List of accounts in .json: https://github.com/Jay-Prime/dfs-uniswap/blob/master/defisaver_accounts.json
Script that demonstrates how we pulled this list of addresses is available here: https://github.com/nklipa13/retroactive-query
Highlighting once again that we provided more context on how we got to these accounts here.
Wouldn't worry, this was posted today by Noah looks like the 15% of the total supply allocated for the airdrop are supposedly locked forever in a contract so its unlikely I'd say that they'll be doing another airdrop
Do you speak English? I can help you with translation - understanding the next steps
Voce fala Ingles? Posso te ajudar com a traducao - entendimento dos proximos passos.
Cheers, easyswap.trade
This topic is temporarily closed for at least 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.
Offering some technical advice: you may benefit from forking the retroactive query repository and requesting each project write a query that identifies all users of their protocol and send a pull request. Then in the final query, union all these project queries and exclude the users contained in the original users query.
I would personally prefer to see all the queries written in this way, merkle tree generated and all immutable contracts deployed (including an immutable merkle root), before submission of any governance proposals.
This topic was automatically opened after 4 hours.
Hi, Please find below the details of our situation. It's a bit different than yours. In our case we are a project selling tokens on Uniswap and we locked Liquidity tokens on a Liquidity vault to prevent RUG PULL.
We are EasySwap, please see the answers on the template below.
Hi, Please find below the details of our situation. It's a bit different than yours. In our case we are a project selling tokens on Uniswap and we locked Liquidity tokens on a Liquidity vault to prevent RUG PULL.
We are EasySwap, please see the answers on the template below.
EasySwap
We have provided liquidity of our coin to Uniswap on this transaction: /token/0xa0471cdd5c0dc2614535fd7505b17a651a8f0dab?a=0x8c0e876f1da58140695673d07ff42d4786207d1b
On our case we have created a Liquidity Vault to prevent RUG PULLING, giving therefore trustworthy to our product and increasing trading volume on Uniswap.
This is the contract /address/0x376b512ccd0704ccc4153870918c6dca2c0ee1c5
And this is the transaction in which the Liquidity was transferred to the liquidity vault
/tx/0xfd6dac3b44406c6cc5d2a1ba2aa70d60071053ba5d322deb4b29fe9048b84b5d
We have a small base of roughly 150 holders who were promissed a participation on the profits by liquidity pool
Sorry that I only saw this post now but I hope it's still in time for processing the request. Kind Regards, EasySwap CEO
It seems I am no longer able to edit the original post, so I would like to follow up here with the updated, more precise number:
It seems I am no longer able to edit the original post, so I would like to follow up here with the updated, more precise number:
~836 users
We provided more context to this number in this reply to the original discussion thread. We have the exact list of account addresses and the full transaction history ready, but would still like to hear any potential comments or objection to this. Thank you.
The final number of affected accounts that were using DeFi Saver should be 605. (This is after checks against the previous UNI airdrop list of accounts, but not against any other submissions here.)
List of accounts in .json: https://github.com/Jay-Prime/dfs-uniswap/blob/master/defisaver_accounts.json
The final number of affected accounts that were using DeFi Saver should be 605. (This is after checks against the previous UNI airdrop list of accounts, but not against any other submissions here.)
List of accounts in .json: https://github.com/Jay-Prime/dfs-uniswap/blob/master/defisaver_accounts.json
Script that demonstrates how we pulled this list of addresses is available here: https://github.com/nklipa13/retroactive-query
Highlighting once again that we provided more context on how we got to these accounts here.
Wouldn't worry, this was posted today by Noah looks like the 15% of the total supply allocated for the airdrop are supposedly locked forever in a contract so its unlikely I'd say that they'll be doing another airdrop
Do you speak English? I can help you with translation - understanding the next steps
Voce fala Ingles? Posso te ajudar com a traducao - entendimento dos proximos passos.
Cheers, easyswap.trade
This topic is temporarily closed for at least 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.
Offering some technical advice: you may benefit from forking the retroactive query repository and requesting each project write a query that identifies all users of their protocol and send a pull request. Then in the final query, union all these project queries and exclude the users contained in the original users query.
I would personally prefer to see all the queries written in this way, merkle tree generated and all immutable contracts deployed (including an immutable merkle root), before submission of any governance proposals.
This topic was automatically opened after 4 hours.
Hi, Please find below the details of our situation. It's a bit different than yours. In our case we are a project selling tokens on Uniswap and we locked Liquidity tokens on a Liquidity vault to prevent RUG PULL.
We are EasySwap, please see the answers on the template below.
Hi, Please find below the details of our situation. It's a bit different than yours. In our case we are a project selling tokens on Uniswap and we locked Liquidity tokens on a Liquidity vault to prevent RUG PULL.
We are EasySwap, please see the answers on the template below.
EasySwap
We have provided liquidity of our coin to Uniswap on this transaction: /token/0xa0471cdd5c0dc2614535fd7505b17a651a8f0dab?a=0x8c0e876f1da58140695673d07ff42d4786207d1b
On our case we have created a Liquidity Vault to prevent RUG PULLING, giving therefore trustworthy to our product and increasing trading volume on Uniswap.
This is the contract /address/0x376b512ccd0704ccc4153870918c6dca2c0ee1c5
And this is the transaction in which the Liquidity was transferred to the liquidity vault
/tx/0xfd6dac3b44406c6cc5d2a1ba2aa70d60071053ba5d322deb4b29fe9048b84b5d
We have a small base of roughly 150 holders who were promissed a participation on the profits by liquidity pool
Sorry that I only saw this post now but I hope it's still in time for processing the request. Kind Regards, EasySwap CEO
It seems I am no longer able to edit the original post, so I would like to follow up here with the updated, more precise number:
It seems I am no longer able to edit the original post, so I would like to follow up here with the updated, more precise number:
~836 users
We provided more context to this number in this reply to the original discussion thread. We have the exact list of account addresses and the full transaction history ready, but would still like to hear any potential comments or objection to this. Thank you.
DeFi Saver
Tweet announcing our Uniswap integration on June 20th 2019
DeFi Saver
Tweet announcing our Uniswap integration on June 20th 2019
The following our four Uniswap wrapper contracts through which user initiated actions were routed:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x0AA70981311D60A9521C99CECFDD68C3E5A83B83
https://etherscan.io/address/0x1E30124FDE14533231216D95F7798CD0061E5CF8
https://etherscan.io/address/0x880A845A85F843A5C67DB2061623C6FC3BB4C511
https://etherscan.io/address/0xFF92ADA50CDC8009686867B4A470C8769BEDB22D
≈600 - 850 users
We'll be following up with the exact number later today.
DeFi Saver
Tweet announcing our Uniswap integration on June 20th 2019
DeFi Saver
Tweet announcing our Uniswap integration on June 20th 2019
The following our four Uniswap wrapper contracts through which user initiated actions were routed:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x0AA70981311D60A9521C99CECFDD68C3E5A83B83
https://etherscan.io/address/0x1E30124FDE14533231216D95F7798CD0061E5CF8
https://etherscan.io/address/0x880A845A85F843A5C67DB2061623C6FC3BB4C511
https://etherscan.io/address/0xFF92ADA50CDC8009686867B4A470C8769BEDB22D
≈600 - 850 users
We'll be following up with the exact number later today.
Thanks @Jay-Prime. Can you please submit this data in PR form to the following repo per the instructions in the README?
https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users
Thanks @Jay-Prime. Can you please submit this data in PR form to the following repo per the instructions in the README?
https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users
https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users
@Jay-Prime
@mounir_paraswap
@varundeshpande
@kvhnuke
@deelbeone
@hsuanting
@Gespo
@ramvi
@itamar_argent.xyz
@easyswaptrade
@nedodn @kvhnuke @Anyhowclick Can you please submit your affected users' lists / scripts to the following repo in PR format per the README's instructions?
https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users
@deelbeone Many of the contract addresses you've listed are unverified contracts on Etherscan with negligible activity on them. Can you please focus your submission to the primary Totle contracts — specifically ones that are verified and had active usage routed through them?
https://twitter.com/NadavAHollander/status/1308569502917902336?s=20
https://twitter.com/NadavAHollander/status/1308462997791109120?s=20
Cont'd:
@bannplayer @Anyhowclick @sohkai @deacix
Thank you @deacix. Can you please submit this in PR form to this repository per the instructions in the README?
https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users
https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users
@Jay-Prime
@mounir_paraswap
@varundeshpande
@kvhnuke
@deelbeone
@hsuanting
@Gespo
@ramvi
@itamar_argent.xyz
@easyswaptrade
@nedodn @kvhnuke @Anyhowclick Can you please submit your affected users' lists / scripts to the following repo in PR format per the README's instructions?
https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users
@deelbeone Many of the contract addresses you've listed are unverified contracts on Etherscan with negligible activity on them. Can you please focus your submission to the primary Totle contracts — specifically ones that are verified and had active usage routed through them?
https://twitter.com/NadavAHollander/status/1308569502917902336?s=20
https://twitter.com/NadavAHollander/status/1308462997791109120?s=20
Cont'd:
@bannplayer @Anyhowclick @sohkai @deacix
Thank you @deacix. Can you please submit this in PR form to this repository per the instructions in the README?
https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/excluded-uni-airdrop-users
Hey everyone! Thank you to all the projects who are participating in the proposal. Here's what I need moving forward to get this proposal to the finish line. I mentioned this previously, but I want to underscore it again: the earliest date users will get their UNI distributed to them is October 17th. As such, there is a much higher premium on rigor than on speed in getting this proposal submitted — though the pulse of the community seems to be largely favorable on this proposal, there are legitimate threads of concern & suspicion that are best addressed through a thoroughly transparent process.
Hey everyone! Thank you to all the projects who are participating in the proposal. Here's what I need moving forward to get this proposal to the finish line. I mentioned this previously, but I want to underscore it again: the earliest date users will get their UNI distributed to them is October 17th. As such, there is a much higher premium on rigor than on speed in getting this proposal submitted — though the pulse of the community seems to be largely favorable on this proposal, there are legitimate threads of concern & suspicion that are best addressed through a thoroughly transparent process.
By the end of this week, we will be submitting a proposal to the governance module that will grant ERC20 approval to a merkle drop contract we deploy committing to a set of addresses for allocation.
That set of addresses will be determined through the process described below. If the number of addresses committed to is greater than 5% of the original allocation, we will have a discussion around whether and how we wish to minimize the amount of UNI that will ultimately be pulled from the community treasury (e.g. by forcing users to preemptively claim their allocation before October 17th on the merkle drop contract). Otherwise, we will proceed with allocating UNI to the addresses aligned on in a manner similar to the initial allocation.
Within the next 48 hours...
We will then compile all of the above into a formalized governance proposal to the broader community. The goal is to have a list of addresses where:
Listed are quite a few more than "four Uniswap wrapper contracts". For sake of clarity, can you please label the contracts and their purpose (see 0x's submission for example)? One, for instance, appears to be related to filling 0x orders (which, I assume, would not be relevant to this).
This will come handy when we later want to pull together the set of affected addresses and verify them!
Judging by what you've shared, it appears your users traded on Uniswap directly, meaning that they were already included in the original airdrop.
Re: agavecoin and lunchmoney
As far as I can tell, these two submissions are not within scope. This seems like an attempt to abuse the process.
If I understand correctly from the information you've provided, your project's users interacted with Uniswap directly and not through a proxy contract. As such, I don't see how it would be appropriate to include AGVC in this proposal's scope.
Great, thanks Varun!
Great, thanks Fulvia!
Thanks for submitting! To clarify, is the proxy contract you listed simply that used by DEX.AG? If so, would it make more sense for DEX.AG to submit an application and for their users to be considered a super-set of your affected users?
Perhaps it might make sense to bundle this into Paraswap's application? Can someone make contact with their team and make sure they submit an application before EOD tomorrow?
Dharma
Tweet announcing the launch of the feature on July 30th
This thread is for PROJECT OWNERS ONLY.
Individual users do not need to post in this thread.
In your case, please reach out to Kyber Network team to ask them to submit an application.
Could you please provide more color here? Are you a representative of the Aragon team? Or a user affected by the proxy contract omission? If one of Aragon's products is affected by this omission, I'd ask that a member of their team submit an application on behalf of all users.
Hey everyone! Thank you to all the projects who are participating in the proposal. Here's what I need moving forward to get this proposal to the finish line. I mentioned this previously, but I want to underscore it again: the earliest date users will get their UNI distributed to them is October 17th. As such, there is a much higher premium on rigor than on speed in getting this proposal submitted — though the pulse of the community seems to be largely favorable on this proposal, there are legitimate threads of concern & suspicion that are best addressed through a thoroughly transparent process.
Hey everyone! Thank you to all the projects who are participating in the proposal. Here's what I need moving forward to get this proposal to the finish line. I mentioned this previously, but I want to underscore it again: the earliest date users will get their UNI distributed to them is October 17th. As such, there is a much higher premium on rigor than on speed in getting this proposal submitted — though the pulse of the community seems to be largely favorable on this proposal, there are legitimate threads of concern & suspicion that are best addressed through a thoroughly transparent process.
By the end of this week, we will be submitting a proposal to the governance module that will grant ERC20 approval to a merkle drop contract we deploy committing to a set of addresses for allocation.
That set of addresses will be determined through the process described below. If the number of addresses committed to is greater than 5% of the original allocation, we will have a discussion around whether and how we wish to minimize the amount of UNI that will ultimately be pulled from the community treasury (e.g. by forcing users to preemptively claim their allocation before October 17th on the merkle drop contract). Otherwise, we will proceed with allocating UNI to the addresses aligned on in a manner similar to the initial allocation.
Within the next 48 hours...
We will then compile all of the above into a formalized governance proposal to the broader community. The goal is to have a list of addresses where:
Listed are quite a few more than "four Uniswap wrapper contracts". For sake of clarity, can you please label the contracts and their purpose (see 0x's submission for example)? One, for instance, appears to be related to filling 0x orders (which, I assume, would not be relevant to this).
This will come handy when we later want to pull together the set of affected addresses and verify them!
Judging by what you've shared, it appears your users traded on Uniswap directly, meaning that they were already included in the original airdrop.
Re: agavecoin and lunchmoney
As far as I can tell, these two submissions are not within scope. This seems like an attempt to abuse the process.
If I understand correctly from the information you've provided, your project's users interacted with Uniswap directly and not through a proxy contract. As such, I don't see how it would be appropriate to include AGVC in this proposal's scope.
Great, thanks Varun!
Great, thanks Fulvia!
Thanks for submitting! To clarify, is the proxy contract you listed simply that used by DEX.AG? If so, would it make more sense for DEX.AG to submit an application and for their users to be considered a super-set of your affected users?
Perhaps it might make sense to bundle this into Paraswap's application? Can someone make contact with their team and make sure they submit an application before EOD tomorrow?
Dharma
Tweet announcing the launch of the feature on July 30th
This thread is for PROJECT OWNERS ONLY.
Individual users do not need to post in this thread.
In your case, please reach out to Kyber Network team to ask them to submit an application.
Could you please provide more color here? Are you a representative of the Aragon team? Or a user affected by the proxy contract omission? If one of Aragon's products is affected by this omission, I'd ask that a member of their team submit an application on behalf of all users.
Dharma
Tweet announcing the launch of the feature on July 30th
https://etherscan.io/address/0x0efb068354c10c070ddd64a0e8eaf8f054df7e26
≈2,000 - 2,500 users
Dharma
Tweet announcing the launch of the feature on July 30th
https://etherscan.io/address/0x0efb068354c10c070ddd64a0e8eaf8f054df7e26
≈2,000 - 2,500 users