The Celo deployment of the Uniswap Protocol is currently connected to the mainnet governance contracts via Optics. The Optics bridge is not currently approved by the Uniswap Bridge Assessment Committee and is not on a path to be approved. To that end, we put forward this proposal to change the cross-chain messaging protocol used to interact with the Celo deployment of Uniswap from Optics to Wormhole.
A governance vote will be required to make this change. Per the normal governance process, this RFC will remain open for a week and the Celo and Wormhole teams will answer any questions that arise. After a week, a Snapshot poll will be posted. Pending a successful Snapshot, an on-chain vote will be instantiated.
Upon completion of this procedure, subsequent governance messages destined for Celo will be transmitted via the UniswapWormholeMessageSender 0xf5F4496219F31CDCBa6130B5402873624585615a and received on Celo by the wormholeReceiverContract 0x0Eb863541278308c3A64F8E908BC646e27BFD071.
In alignment with the standards endorsed by the Uniswap DAO's cross-chain bridge assessment team, this proposal recommends migrating the Celo UniswapV3Factory contract owner from the Optics bridge to the Wormhole bridge. This shift will make use of the existing Optics governance bridge to implement the transition and ensure that the cross-chain governance mechanism aligns with the assessment team's recognized structure.
We recognize Celo's move to an L2 on Ethereum. However, given Optics' impending phase-out before Celo completes this transition, it's important we proceed with the proposed switch to the Wormhole bridge rather than postponing until after the transition and then proposing a bridge migration. After Celo's transition to an L2, we may reassess and propose a further migration to the canonical bridge.
0x39762F8AF694666Ed5e8123eF655F8B0CdeEB365
The Celo deployment of the Uniswap Protocol is currently connected to the mainnet governance contracts via Optics. The Optics bridge is not currently approved by the Uniswap Bridge Assessment Committee and is not on a path to be approved. To that end, we put forward this proposal to change the cross-chain messaging protocol used to interact with the Celo deployment of Uniswap from Optics to Wormhole.
A governance vote will be required to make this change. Per the normal governance process, this RFC will remain open for a week and the Celo and Wormhole teams will answer any questions that arise. After a week, a Snapshot poll will be posted. Pending a successful Snapshot, an on-chain vote will be instantiated.
Upon completion of this procedure, subsequent governance messages destined for Celo will be transmitted via the UniswapWormholeMessageSender 0xf5F4496219F31CDCBa6130B5402873624585615a and received on Celo by the wormholeReceiverContract 0x0Eb863541278308c3A64F8E908BC646e27BFD071.
In alignment with the standards endorsed by the Uniswap DAO's cross-chain bridge assessment team, this proposal recommends migrating the Celo UniswapV3Factory contract owner from the Optics bridge to the Wormhole bridge. This shift will make use of the existing Optics governance bridge to implement the transition and ensure that the cross-chain governance mechanism aligns with the assessment team's recognized structure.
We recognize Celo's move to an L2 on Ethereum. However, given Optics' impending phase-out before Celo completes this transition, it's important we proceed with the proposed switch to the Wormhole bridge rather than postponing until after the transition and then proposing a bridge migration. After Celo's transition to an L2, we may reassess and propose a further migration to the canonical bridge.
0x39762F8AF694666Ed5e8123eF655F8B0CdeEB365
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/temp-check-migrate-the-celo-uniswap-v3-factory-contract-owner-from-optics-to-wormhole/21629/2?u=kaereste
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/temp-check-migrate-the-celo-uniswap-v3-factory-contract-owner-from-optics-to-wormhole/21629/2?u=kaereste
L2BEAT is voting FOR this proposal in the temperature check as it is in line with the recommendations of the Uniswap Bridge Assessment Committee.
L2BEAT is voting FOR this proposal in the temperature check as it is in line with the recommendations of the Uniswap Bridge Assessment Committee.
