Temperature Check Passed: https://gov.uniswap.org/t/temperature-check-should-we-be-managing-systemic-risk-in-uniswaps-community-treasury-using-kpi-options/12624 12
Consensus Check Passed: https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-create-uniswap-volume-kpi-options-to-help-divest-uniswap-s-community-treasury-into-stablecoins/13533
Prior to submitting proposal for on-chain governance vote, I wanted to clarify specifications, process and procedure.
If you have read the temperature and consensus check, skip to Specifications.
We explored the issue of systemic risk in a treasury of 100% $UNI tokens, where there can be and have been significant drawdowns that directly effect the spending power and run way of the community treasury.
There are additional issues with paying grants with a volatile asset like $UNI:
The purpose of this proposal is to initiate the process of building a KPI option using UMA’s battle tested EMP contracts (more details at the bottom) in order for the Uniswap Community Treasury (or anyone that wants to) to mint KPI options using $UNI as collateral to purchase stablecoins from the community.
KPI options can be created from any number of defined metrics/indicators, from feedback from the UNI community, the best metric to align stake holders with long term goals of Uniswap’s platform is to track the Volume across Uniswap.
The beauty of KPI options is that it creates a win-win situation between Uniswap Stakeholders and the platform itself. Stakeholders that hold KPI options has the direct incentive to continue to support Uniswap platform because the value of the options increase as the overall value of the Uniswap platform grows.
UMA has built and deployed Uniswap's Volume KPI option, here's the contract address:
https://etherscan.io/address/0xebf4849eda1f518bc1b2ce3120668e6465718be3
UMA Implementation specs on calculation method and script to calculate:
https://github.com/UMAprotocol/UMIPs/blob/master/Implementations/uniswap-volume-kpi.md
We closely mimic the methodology that Uniswap uses on their website to mitigate potential manipulation of volume and restricted to top pairs to each V2 and V3 calculation.
Yam.finance has extensive knowledge on building synthetics on UMA’s platform via our development of degenerative.finance V2 of site to be launched soon. Combined with our experience in DAO treasury management, it allows us to have a unique perspective to create this proposal.
https://claim.umaproject.org/ 2
https://forum.sushi.com/t/build-kpi-options-with-uma-to-speed-kashi-adoption/3940 1
Temperature Check Passed: https://gov.uniswap.org/t/temperature-check-should-we-be-managing-systemic-risk-in-uniswaps-community-treasury-using-kpi-options/12624 12
Consensus Check Passed: https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-create-uniswap-volume-kpi-options-to-help-divest-uniswap-s-community-treasury-into-stablecoins/13533
Prior to submitting proposal for on-chain governance vote, I wanted to clarify specifications, process and procedure.
If you have read the temperature and consensus check, skip to Specifications.
We explored the issue of systemic risk in a treasury of 100% $UNI tokens, where there can be and have been significant drawdowns that directly effect the spending power and run way of the community treasury.
There are additional issues with paying grants with a volatile asset like $UNI:
The purpose of this proposal is to initiate the process of building a KPI option using UMA’s battle tested EMP contracts (more details at the bottom) in order for the Uniswap Community Treasury (or anyone that wants to) to mint KPI options using $UNI as collateral to purchase stablecoins from the community.
KPI options can be created from any number of defined metrics/indicators, from feedback from the UNI community, the best metric to align stake holders with long term goals of Uniswap’s platform is to track the Volume across Uniswap.
The beauty of KPI options is that it creates a win-win situation between Uniswap Stakeholders and the platform itself. Stakeholders that hold KPI options has the direct incentive to continue to support Uniswap platform because the value of the options increase as the overall value of the Uniswap platform grows.
UMA has built and deployed Uniswap's Volume KPI option, here's the contract address:
https://etherscan.io/address/0xebf4849eda1f518bc1b2ce3120668e6465718be3
UMA Implementation specs on calculation method and script to calculate:
https://github.com/UMAprotocol/UMIPs/blob/master/Implementations/uniswap-volume-kpi.md
We closely mimic the methodology that Uniswap uses on their website to mitigate potential manipulation of volume and restricted to top pairs to each V2 and V3 calculation.
Yam.finance has extensive knowledge on building synthetics on UMA’s platform via our development of degenerative.finance V2 of site to be launched soon. Combined with our experience in DAO treasury management, it allows us to have a unique perspective to create this proposal.
https://claim.umaproject.org/ 2
https://forum.sushi.com/t/build-kpi-options-with-uma-to-speed-kashi-adoption/3940 1