The onchain vote to renew the Uniswap Accountability Committee (UAC) has passed. We will commence with the election of two new committee members.

For a detailed account of the type of work that the UAC conducts and will plan on undertaking during Season 3, please read the Season 2 Report on the forums here.

The members below have applied on the forums. The top two winners will be part of the committee. Each member's pitch can be found on this forum thread: https://gov.uniswap.org/t/uac-season-3-application/24618

Please note this rule from the forum post with respect to voting fairplay:

• If you or anyone from your organization is applying for a UAC position, you are not allowed to designate 100% of your voting power to the candidate in question. The maximum self-voting % allowed is 50%, and this amount must be at least evenly distributed among other candidates. The maximum self-vote percentage in any scenario must be matched equally with at least one other candidate.
  • Example: if you self-vote with 50% of your voting power, you must give one more candidate the other 50% (max matching 50%). If you self-vote with 25% of your voting power, you may divide the remaining 75% among as many candidates as you like, as long as one other candidate also receives 25% (max matching 25%). The self-vote % is simply your own voting cap that must be matched at least once with another applicant.
• This setup introduces a cap to self-voting, while simultaneously giving a degree of priority to yourself, as we understand that you would not be applying if you didn’t feel like a qualified candidate. This is something that was “soft consensus” decided when some issues arose with the treasury working group vote a few months ago.

Eligibility Criteria As specified on the forums, you are only allowed to apply as an individual—not as an organization, using your DAO-recognized name and identity. The applicants are shown in the order by which they applied with their individual listed DAO-recognized name.

The onchain vote to renew the Uniswap Accountability Committee (UAC) has passed. We will commence with the election of two new committee members.

For a detailed account of the type of work that the UAC conducts and will plan on undertaking during Season 3, please read the Season 2 Report on the forums here.

The members below have applied on the forums. The top two winners will be part of the committee. Each member's pitch can be found on this forum thread: https://gov.uniswap.org/t/uac-season-3-application/24618

Please note this rule from the forum post with respect to voting fairplay:

• If you or anyone from your organization is applying for a UAC position, you are not allowed to designate 100% of your voting power to the candidate in question. The maximum self-voting % allowed is 50%, and this amount must be at least evenly distributed among other candidates. The maximum self-vote percentage in any scenario must be matched equally with at least one other candidate.
  • Example: if you self-vote with 50% of your voting power, you must give one more candidate the other 50% (max matching 50%). If you self-vote with 25% of your voting power, you may divide the remaining 75% among as many candidates as you like, as long as one other candidate also receives 25% (max matching 25%). The self-vote % is simply your own voting cap that must be matched at least once with another applicant.
• This setup introduces a cap to self-voting, while simultaneously giving a degree of priority to yourself, as we understand that you would not be applying if you didn’t feel like a qualified candidate. This is something that was “soft consensus” decided when some issues arose with the treasury working group vote a few months ago.

Eligibility Criteria As specified on the forums, you are only allowed to apply as an individual—not as an organization, using your DAO-recognized name and identity. The applicants are shown in the order by which they applied with their individual listed DAO-recognized name.