Following Uniswap’s successful deployment on the Scroll testnet, the Scroll team is proposing that the Uniswap DAO recognizes Scroll's upcoming mainnet deployment of Uniswap V3 as the official deployment.
Point of Contact: [ Lea Schmitt, E-mail: [email protected]]
We propose that the Uniswap DAO recognizes Scroll's upcoming mainnet deployment of Uniswap V3 as the official, canonical deployment. Uniswap V3 has already been deployed to Scroll’s testnet, and the Uniswap router has processed over 1.8M transactions there.
We propose that Uniswap will showcase this by integrating Scroll into its user interface.
Uniswap being deployed on multiple Ethereum L2s is integral for encouraging competition and diversity of technical solutions to scale Ethereum. We believe that Uniswap's community and the ecosystem that Scroll strives for are closely aligned. Both projects are building trustless, decentralized, and secure financial infrastructure that is accessible to anyone, regardless of merit or location. Deploying to Scroll offers many benefits, including significant user savings, an expanded user base, capturing the zkEVM market, and fostering L2 native innovation.
This deployment positions Uniswap as an early mover and captures a rapidly growing market as the Ethereum ecosystem gradually shifts to zkEVMs.
Uniswap on Scroll will integrate closely with Scroll's rapidly growing ecosystem. Dozens of projects have committed to deploying on our mainnet, and many are deployed on our testnet: AAVE, Lens, the Graph, Covalent, Safe, and Etherscan to name a few. Given the excitement around Scroll and current usage of our testnet, we expect hundreds of projects to deploy on our mainnet post-launch.
Importantly, Uniswap on Scroll will propel L2 DEX innovation. We are on the brink of uncovering L2 native use cases that have not been feasible on Ethereum L1. Scroll will bring new developers and ecosystem integrations to Uniswap.
Deployment of Uniswap on Scroll will:
Moreover, Scroll will bring its dedicated and expanding developer community to Uniswap, thereby boosting the growth of Uniswap's developer community.
The best way to measure success for Uniswap on Scroll is to focus on TVL and transaction volumes. We think that Scroll can deliver an additional $100M of TVL to Uniswap within two months of launch.
ZK-Rollup is currently the most secure Layer 2 scaling solution. On the premise of inheriting the security of Ethereum, it relies exclusively on cryptography rather than unreliable crypto-economics.
Scroll has a trustless Layer 1 <> Layer 2 canonical bridge, which supports arbitrary message delivery. The bridge is part of the roll-up mechanism, verified by the smart contract and the zkEVM, which is much more secure than relayer-based bridges.
Security is the first priority for us. Scroll implements the EVM, which is well-specified and battle-tested. Additionally, we are working with two external auditing companies to audit our bridge code, and we have an in-house security team that continuously reviews our codebase.
We plan to launch with a timelock delay and a security council to control privileged functions and contract upgrades. Finally, shortly after launch, we will introduce distributed sequencer operators.
After the Temperature Check, we will move forward with deploying Uniswap V3 on our Scroll mainnet, following which we will submit the Governance Proposal with the addition of the deployed contract addresses. Since we are fully compatible with EVM, it is effortless to deploy on Scroll. We expect the full deployment will take a few hours.
The approval of this proposal by Uniswap governance will lead the following Uniswap v3 contracts [to be filled in after deployment] to be deemed as the canonical Uniswap deployment on Scroll. This deployment will be subject to Ethereum Layer 1 Uniswap Protocol governance. The text record of the uniswap.eth ENS subdomain titled v3-deployments.uniswap.eth will be amended to reference the Uniswap v3 Factory contract on Scroll following the process outlined here: Post-BSL Cross-chain Deployment Process & New Uniswap.eth Subdomain.
Following Uniswap’s successful deployment on the Scroll testnet, the Scroll team is proposing that the Uniswap DAO recognizes Scroll's upcoming mainnet deployment of Uniswap V3 as the official deployment.
Point of Contact: [ Lea Schmitt, E-mail: [email protected]]
We propose that the Uniswap DAO recognizes Scroll's upcoming mainnet deployment of Uniswap V3 as the official, canonical deployment. Uniswap V3 has already been deployed to Scroll’s testnet, and the Uniswap router has processed over 1.8M transactions there.
We propose that Uniswap will showcase this by integrating Scroll into its user interface.
Uniswap being deployed on multiple Ethereum L2s is integral for encouraging competition and diversity of technical solutions to scale Ethereum. We believe that Uniswap's community and the ecosystem that Scroll strives for are closely aligned. Both projects are building trustless, decentralized, and secure financial infrastructure that is accessible to anyone, regardless of merit or location. Deploying to Scroll offers many benefits, including significant user savings, an expanded user base, capturing the zkEVM market, and fostering L2 native innovation.
This deployment positions Uniswap as an early mover and captures a rapidly growing market as the Ethereum ecosystem gradually shifts to zkEVMs.
Uniswap on Scroll will integrate closely with Scroll's rapidly growing ecosystem. Dozens of projects have committed to deploying on our mainnet, and many are deployed on our testnet: AAVE, Lens, the Graph, Covalent, Safe, and Etherscan to name a few. Given the excitement around Scroll and current usage of our testnet, we expect hundreds of projects to deploy on our mainnet post-launch.
Importantly, Uniswap on Scroll will propel L2 DEX innovation. We are on the brink of uncovering L2 native use cases that have not been feasible on Ethereum L1. Scroll will bring new developers and ecosystem integrations to Uniswap.
Deployment of Uniswap on Scroll will:
Moreover, Scroll will bring its dedicated and expanding developer community to Uniswap, thereby boosting the growth of Uniswap's developer community.
The best way to measure success for Uniswap on Scroll is to focus on TVL and transaction volumes. We think that Scroll can deliver an additional $100M of TVL to Uniswap within two months of launch.
ZK-Rollup is currently the most secure Layer 2 scaling solution. On the premise of inheriting the security of Ethereum, it relies exclusively on cryptography rather than unreliable crypto-economics.
Scroll has a trustless Layer 1 <> Layer 2 canonical bridge, which supports arbitrary message delivery. The bridge is part of the roll-up mechanism, verified by the smart contract and the zkEVM, which is much more secure than relayer-based bridges.
Security is the first priority for us. Scroll implements the EVM, which is well-specified and battle-tested. Additionally, we are working with two external auditing companies to audit our bridge code, and we have an in-house security team that continuously reviews our codebase.
We plan to launch with a timelock delay and a security council to control privileged functions and contract upgrades. Finally, shortly after launch, we will introduce distributed sequencer operators.
After the Temperature Check, we will move forward with deploying Uniswap V3 on our Scroll mainnet, following which we will submit the Governance Proposal with the addition of the deployed contract addresses. Since we are fully compatible with EVM, it is effortless to deploy on Scroll. We expect the full deployment will take a few hours.
The approval of this proposal by Uniswap governance will lead the following Uniswap v3 contracts [to be filled in after deployment] to be deemed as the canonical Uniswap deployment on Scroll. This deployment will be subject to Ethereum Layer 1 Uniswap Protocol governance. The text record of the uniswap.eth ENS subdomain titled v3-deployments.uniswap.eth will be amended to reference the Uniswap v3 Factory contract on Scroll following the process outlined here: Post-BSL Cross-chain Deployment Process & New Uniswap.eth Subdomain.
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-deploy-uniswap-v3-on-scroll/21651/4?u=kaereste
There is (in our opinion) no reason not to recognize the deployment as official so that the DAO may hold the power to turn on the fee switch
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-deploy-uniswap-v3-on-scroll/21651/4?u=kaereste
There is (in our opinion) no reason not to recognize the deployment as official so that the DAO may hold the power to turn on the fee switch
Hello, I know, it’s not directly related but how to create a new post for a new chain ? I’m meaning where I should click on this forum ?
Hello, you can start with a temperature check-tagged forum post.
Agreed to polygon would be a great move
Hello, I know, it’s not directly related but how to create a new post for a new chain ? I’m meaning where I should click on this forum ?
Hello, you can start with a temperature check-tagged forum post.
Agreed to polygon would be a great move
why not deploying is better
Agree ,UNI V3 to polygon
Yessssss get it doneeeee
I have no problem with this why not
LOL this philosophy led to the ruin of IBM, Ford, ABB, etc...
We are providing NFT V3 Lending product，If Uniswap deployed multichain，then we will help to growth as well. I support this proposal!
I like this concept and think we should consider this seriously. Just my 2 cents & a bitcoin :slight_smile:
why not deploying is better
Agree ,UNI V3 to polygon
Yessssss get it doneeeee
I have no problem with this why not
LOL this philosophy led to the ruin of IBM, Ford, ABB, etc...
We are providing NFT V3 Lending product，If Uniswap deployed multichain，then we will help to growth as well. I support this proposal!
I like this concept and think we should consider this seriously. Just my 2 cents & a bitcoin :slight_smile:
I see people saying that Polygon is less secure than Ethereum. Ok, point taken. But at least one person said that it's not secure "enough". @Hindel how did you reach that judgement? What facts about Polygon (about its consensus mechanism, about its commits to ETH, etc) lead you to believe that?
Even if they go with Optimism, why not port to Polygon too?
Uniswap could easily dominate that market as well..
Even if Optimism is better 'techwise', the network effects on Polygon (AAVE, 1Inch, etc..) are so powerful now it might not even matter much. From a business (not engineering) perspective, seems like they are missing an opportunity.
I personally think, polygon multisig maybe the reason why Uniswap is still not confident for it.
As polygon multisig is under 8 memebers where 5 members if act bad can bring down whole network.
In coming months governance will be enabled on Polygon, maybe by that time Uniswap team will be even more confident with Polygon network.
完全同意这个观点 UNI to the Moon !
希望快速上l2，这样可以减低很多gas费，上线以后uni的交易量会呈现爆炸式增长！
I see people saying that Polygon is less secure than Ethereum. Ok, point taken. But at least one person said that it's not secure "enough". @Hindel how did you reach that judgement? What facts about Polygon (about its consensus mechanism, about its commits to ETH, etc) lead you to believe that?
Even if they go with Optimism, why not port to Polygon too?
Uniswap could easily dominate that market as well..
Even if Optimism is better 'techwise', the network effects on Polygon (AAVE, 1Inch, etc..) are so powerful now it might not even matter much. From a business (not engineering) perspective, seems like they are missing an opportunity.
I personally think, polygon multisig maybe the reason why Uniswap is still not confident for it.
As polygon multisig is under 8 memebers where 5 members if act bad can bring down whole network.
In coming months governance will be enabled on Polygon, maybe by that time Uniswap team will be even more confident with Polygon network.
完全同意这个观点 UNI to the Moon !
希望快速上l2，这样可以减低很多gas费，上线以后uni的交易量会呈现爆炸式增长！
I think deploying Uniswap V3 to Polygon is a great idea. The fees are super low (practically free) and transactions are ridiculously fast.
Polygon has pretty much become the de-facto scaling solution for Ethereum and currently handles 5x daily transaction as Ethereum.
Surely our community deserve to have the benefits which the users of AAVE, 1inch, QuickSwap and countless other currently enjoy!
I think deploying Uniswap V3 to Polygon is a great idea. The fees are super low (practically free) and transactions are ridiculously fast.
Polygon has pretty much become the de-facto scaling solution for Ethereum and currently handles 5x daily transaction as Ethereum.
Surely our community deserve to have the benefits which the users of AAVE, 1inch, QuickSwap and countless other currently enjoy!
Does someone want to create a poll so we can gauge current support?
I agree UNI V3 to Polygon.
market
The critical mass liquidity is moving to Polygon.
Aave, Sushi, Curve.. the blue chip Defi apps are on Polygon.
The critical mass liquidity is moving to Polygon.
Aave, Sushi, Curve.. the blue chip Defi apps are on Polygon.
Once you bridge to Polygon POS, there isn't much incentive to bridge back to L1 when gas costs are fractions of a cent on Matic.
Polygon, unlike BSC is a bet on Ethereum not against it.
Seems like a no-brainer to me. 🤷🏻♂️
Also... Polygon is a commit chain (it make regular commit to L1) with open validators.
You have to keep in mind the incredible amount of legitimacy deploying uniswap on a chain brings. uniswap being on any chain will bring an incredible numbers of users. This gives a lot of power to the protocol. Chains need uniswap, uniswap doesn't need chains. In which direction do we want resources/people to go? Should we provide legitimacy to a centeralized "blockchain"(more like a database/bank) like BSC? Should we provide legitimacy to Polygon, whose largest validator is binance? is Polygon decenteralized enough? Do we want to support multichain and go to DOT?
Answers to questions like this are important when evaluating EVM compatible chains.
I also agree. Uniswap should deploy to the Polygon sidechain, and should not play favourites as Arbitrum and zkSync 2.0 roll out alongside Optimism in the coming months. Uniswap v3's improved capital efficiency makes it uniquely capable of offering good liquidity with low TLV. Uniswap benefits from dominating the DEX market on Ethereum sidechains and L2s.
AAVE, Compound,Open Sea, many NFT projects, Sushi, Mani games , METAVERSE are migrating to Polygon
Agree and I'll add that Uni should be working with Arbitrum launching 5/28 since they're beating optimism to market and will likely be a more useful L2 overall.
I happen to believe the exact opposite: A leader with more than a 60% market share (Uniswap's situation right now) shouldn't be the one making bold moves and taking risks. The competition should, they are so small that they have to do something about it.
Of course I'd have a different opinion if the market share was dropping, but it's not.
There's absolutely no reason for Uniswap to compromise on security and sacrifice decentralization right now.
Extremely valid concerns here @Hindel, especially with the 5 multisig complexity and security concerns are real. Impatience won't offset that risk.
Getting to arbitrum first is a no brainer, and the security is much clearer --- the week long delay return of funds has long been debated, but feels like the right balance if security is the key risk. Optimism's launch is up in the air so :man_shrugging:...
Extremely valid concerns here @Hindel, especially with the 5 multisig complexity and security concerns are real. Impatience won't offset that risk.
Getting to arbitrum first is a no brainer, and the security is much clearer --- the week long delay return of funds has long been debated, but feels like the right balance if security is the key risk. Optimism's launch is up in the air so :man_shrugging:...
That said, I'd lean to getting onto Polygon in the short term; the security risk is a very small corner case and right now the market is defined by momentum; would be a shame to be overly cautious in a spot where being the leader requires continued bold moves.
I think deploying Uniswap V3 to Polygon is a great idea. The fees are super low (practically free) and transactions are ridiculously fast.
Polygon has pretty much become the de-facto scaling solution for Ethereum and currently handles 5x daily transaction as Ethereum.
Surely our community deserve to have the benefits which the users of AAVE, 1inch, QuickSwap and countless other currently enjoy!
I think deploying Uniswap V3 to Polygon is a great idea. The fees are super low (practically free) and transactions are ridiculously fast.
Polygon has pretty much become the de-facto scaling solution for Ethereum and currently handles 5x daily transaction as Ethereum.
Surely our community deserve to have the benefits which the users of AAVE, 1inch, QuickSwap and countless other currently enjoy!
Does someone want to create a poll so we can gauge current support?
I agree UNI V3 to Polygon.
market
The critical mass liquidity is moving to Polygon.
Aave, Sushi, Curve.. the blue chip Defi apps are on Polygon.
The critical mass liquidity is moving to Polygon.
Aave, Sushi, Curve.. the blue chip Defi apps are on Polygon.
Once you bridge to Polygon POS, there isn't much incentive to bridge back to L1 when gas costs are fractions of a cent on Matic.
Polygon, unlike BSC is a bet on Ethereum not against it.
Seems like a no-brainer to me. 🤷🏻♂️
Also... Polygon is a commit chain (it make regular commit to L1) with open validators.
You have to keep in mind the incredible amount of legitimacy deploying uniswap on a chain brings. uniswap being on any chain will bring an incredible numbers of users. This gives a lot of power to the protocol. Chains need uniswap, uniswap doesn't need chains. In which direction do we want resources/people to go? Should we provide legitimacy to a centeralized "blockchain"(more like a database/bank) like BSC? Should we provide legitimacy to Polygon, whose largest validator is binance? is Polygon decenteralized enough? Do we want to support multichain and go to DOT?
Answers to questions like this are important when evaluating EVM compatible chains.
I also agree. Uniswap should deploy to the Polygon sidechain, and should not play favourites as Arbitrum and zkSync 2.0 roll out alongside Optimism in the coming months. Uniswap v3's improved capital efficiency makes it uniquely capable of offering good liquidity with low TLV. Uniswap benefits from dominating the DEX market on Ethereum sidechains and L2s.
AAVE, Compound,Open Sea, many NFT projects, Sushi, Mani games , METAVERSE are migrating to Polygon
Agree and I'll add that Uni should be working with Arbitrum launching 5/28 since they're beating optimism to market and will likely be a more useful L2 overall.
I happen to believe the exact opposite: A leader with more than a 60% market share (Uniswap's situation right now) shouldn't be the one making bold moves and taking risks. The competition should, they are so small that they have to do something about it.
Of course I'd have a different opinion if the market share was dropping, but it's not.
There's absolutely no reason for Uniswap to compromise on security and sacrifice decentralization right now.
Extremely valid concerns here @Hindel, especially with the 5 multisig complexity and security concerns are real. Impatience won't offset that risk.
Getting to arbitrum first is a no brainer, and the security is much clearer --- the week long delay return of funds has long been debated, but feels like the right balance if security is the key risk. Optimism's launch is up in the air so :man_shrugging:...
Extremely valid concerns here @Hindel, especially with the 5 multisig complexity and security concerns are real. Impatience won't offset that risk.
Getting to arbitrum first is a no brainer, and the security is much clearer --- the week long delay return of funds has long been debated, but feels like the right balance if security is the key risk. Optimism's launch is up in the air so :man_shrugging:...
That said, I'd lean to getting onto Polygon in the short term; the security risk is a very small corner case and right now the market is defined by momentum; would be a shame to be overly cautious in a spot where being the leader requires continued bold moves.
Further ... the Uniswap "team" has delegated governance to the community. Let's take action. The one thing Sushi dominates on is community participation.. I'll give them that. Let's all step up.
thanks for your input !
We have two choices in front of us:
We have two choices in front of us:
My point is that "less good than Ethereum" is not good enough. Uniswap is Ethereum's leading application by a vast margin, the risk is not worth it at all.
Why would we even make any compromise on security when we no longer have to?
While I agree with a deployment on Arbitrum (in addition to Optimism), I disagree with a deployment on Polygon. Despite billing itself as fully Ethereum friendly, in its current form Polygon is an Ethereum competitor. It has its own consensus mechanism, has its own currency, and has Binance as a main investor.
Those who watched their marketing material are probably thinking "hey but it's a commit chain!". Yes, and let me ask you this: what would you think of an excel spreadsheet committing to Ethereum every 10 blocks? Would you trust it with your funds?
While I agree with a deployment on Arbitrum (in addition to Optimism), I disagree with a deployment on Polygon. Despite billing itself as fully Ethereum friendly, in its current form Polygon is an Ethereum competitor. It has its own consensus mechanism, has its own currency, and has Binance as a main investor.
Those who watched their marketing material are probably thinking "hey but it's a commit chain!". Yes, and let me ask you this: what would you think of an excel spreadsheet committing to Ethereum every 10 blocks? Would you trust it with your funds?
"Committing" doesn't mean "sharing security", at all.
Polygon isn't secure enough. Let's stick with Ethereum and its real L2s.
I think Uniswap is snobbing Polygon because the security properties are a step-down from Ethereum mainnet.
I agree that it’s not "technically" a L2, and it’s really more of a "sidechain".
But when Optimism gets delayed for a 5th (or so) time, etc., maybe it’s just time to drop the purism and the haughty take on the ecosystem and just deploy on Polygon as a means to maintain market domination.
I think Uniswap is snobbing Polygon because the security properties are a step-down from Ethereum mainnet.
I agree that it’s not "technically" a L2, and it’s really more of a "sidechain".
But when Optimism gets delayed for a 5th (or so) time, etc., maybe it’s just time to drop the purism and the haughty take on the ecosystem and just deploy on Polygon as a means to maintain market domination.
Maybe they have some kind of contract with Optimism we are not aware of. In any case, they seem to have deep ties with the team.
In the Discord AMA the team clearly stated that they were not ‘maried’ so to speak with Optimism.
Maybe it’s time to prove it… idk.
Also, maybe let the users choose which is the best EVM sidechain or L2 for them ? If Optimism is indeed a better solution, I think Polygon will become a ghosttown when it really lands on Ethereum…
It's an interesting bet to say the least. And it's pretty much an "all-in" bet right now. Like, it seems there are just no possible compromise in their minds. As it's been highlighted many times now on Twitter, Sushi is basically doing the opposite : taking literally ANY opportunity, opening up to multiple communities at once. And in doing so, beefing up support on social media, etc. (But with clearly inferior infrastructure post-V3).
In any event, it would be nice to get a symbolic proposal going. UNI holders signaling support for Polygon deployment or not. Governance doesn't technically control deployment to other networks.
I'm thinking the Optimism public mainnet eployment might be, very soon (still july on their website though). That's maybe why they want to refrain from deploying on Polygon at this precise point in time.
There are just 0 updates from them on their blog, or even on their twitter !
Polygon is where all the action currently is and all the other big projects already deployed there. Would be shame to clusterize at this point and just UNI to be on Optimism.
I strongly support Uni on Polygon and it should even come before Optimism.
Terminology is important, but that should not stop us to go to Polygon.
Actually, I believe Uniswap v3 should deploy on every EVM compatible chain with some real volume. Uniswap can be the king of EVM trading if it allowed itself.
What are the required steps to successfully launch on Polygon?
Ok let’s do this ASAP
https://twitter.com/bantg/status/1393488167488077825/photo/1 this thread is interesting for the 'cons'
If anyone can give me the cons of deploying V3 to Polygon, I'd be happy. Right now I only see pros.
@haydenadams
Why not deploying uniswap v3 in xDai chain? its EVM compatible
Further ... the Uniswap "team" has delegated governance to the community. Let's take action. The one thing Sushi dominates on is community participation.. I'll give them that. Let's all step up.
thanks for your input !
We have two choices in front of us:
We have two choices in front of us:
My point is that "less good than Ethereum" is not good enough. Uniswap is Ethereum's leading application by a vast margin, the risk is not worth it at all.
Why would we even make any compromise on security when we no longer have to?
While I agree with a deployment on Arbitrum (in addition to Optimism), I disagree with a deployment on Polygon. Despite billing itself as fully Ethereum friendly, in its current form Polygon is an Ethereum competitor. It has its own consensus mechanism, has its own currency, and has Binance as a main investor.
Those who watched their marketing material are probably thinking "hey but it's a commit chain!". Yes, and let me ask you this: what would you think of an excel spreadsheet committing to Ethereum every 10 blocks? Would you trust it with your funds?
While I agree with a deployment on Arbitrum (in addition to Optimism), I disagree with a deployment on Polygon. Despite billing itself as fully Ethereum friendly, in its current form Polygon is an Ethereum competitor. It has its own consensus mechanism, has its own currency, and has Binance as a main investor.
Those who watched their marketing material are probably thinking "hey but it's a commit chain!". Yes, and let me ask you this: what would you think of an excel spreadsheet committing to Ethereum every 10 blocks? Would you trust it with your funds?
"Committing" doesn't mean "sharing security", at all.
Polygon isn't secure enough. Let's stick with Ethereum and its real L2s.
I think Uniswap is snobbing Polygon because the security properties are a step-down from Ethereum mainnet.
I agree that it’s not "technically" a L2, and it’s really more of a "sidechain".
But when Optimism gets delayed for a 5th (or so) time, etc., maybe it’s just time to drop the purism and the haughty take on the ecosystem and just deploy on Polygon as a means to maintain market domination.
I think Uniswap is snobbing Polygon because the security properties are a step-down from Ethereum mainnet.
I agree that it’s not "technically" a L2, and it’s really more of a "sidechain".
But when Optimism gets delayed for a 5th (or so) time, etc., maybe it’s just time to drop the purism and the haughty take on the ecosystem and just deploy on Polygon as a means to maintain market domination.
Maybe they have some kind of contract with Optimism we are not aware of. In any case, they seem to have deep ties with the team.
In the Discord AMA the team clearly stated that they were not ‘maried’ so to speak with Optimism.
Maybe it’s time to prove it… idk.
Also, maybe let the users choose which is the best EVM sidechain or L2 for them ? If Optimism is indeed a better solution, I think Polygon will become a ghosttown when it really lands on Ethereum…
It's an interesting bet to say the least. And it's pretty much an "all-in" bet right now. Like, it seems there are just no possible compromise in their minds. As it's been highlighted many times now on Twitter, Sushi is basically doing the opposite : taking literally ANY opportunity, opening up to multiple communities at once. And in doing so, beefing up support on social media, etc. (But with clearly inferior infrastructure post-V3).
In any event, it would be nice to get a symbolic proposal going. UNI holders signaling support for Polygon deployment or not. Governance doesn't technically control deployment to other networks.
I'm thinking the Optimism public mainnet eployment might be, very soon (still july on their website though). That's maybe why they want to refrain from deploying on Polygon at this precise point in time.
There are just 0 updates from them on their blog, or even on their twitter !
Polygon is where all the action currently is and all the other big projects already deployed there. Would be shame to clusterize at this point and just UNI to be on Optimism.
I strongly support Uni on Polygon and it should even come before Optimism.
Terminology is important, but that should not stop us to go to Polygon.
Actually, I believe Uniswap v3 should deploy on every EVM compatible chain with some real volume. Uniswap can be the king of EVM trading if it allowed itself.
What are the required steps to successfully launch on Polygon?
Ok let’s do this ASAP
https://twitter.com/bantg/status/1393488167488077825/photo/1 this thread is interesting for the 'cons'
If anyone can give me the cons of deploying V3 to Polygon, I'd be happy. Right now I only see pros.
@haydenadams
Why not deploying uniswap v3 in xDai chain? its EVM compatible
Polygon is great, but we also need other chains.
As we all know:
If L2 is the future Why not deploy uniswap directly in HERMEZ? I believe polygon will also transfer the ecology to HERMEZ in the future.
I agree UNI V3 to Polygon.
Maybe put a poll up? Seems like there is good support.
Polygon is great, but we also need other chains.
As we all know:
If L2 is the future Why not deploy uniswap directly in HERMEZ? I believe polygon will also transfer the ecology to HERMEZ in the future.
I agree UNI V3 to Polygon.
Maybe put a poll up? Seems like there is good support.
